期刊文献+

竞争、偏好与信贷契约治理效率——基于比较制度实验的研究 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 偏好机制作为规制道德风险行为的基础制度安排,受到了信贷契约所处竞争态势的影响,两者共同决定了信贷契约的治理效率。本文采用比较制度实验方法,研究了对称市场、买方竞争和卖方竞争三种信贷市场中偏好机制的治理效率,对比分析了三种竞争状态下的市场绩效和收益分布,研究结果表明:买方竞争强化了偏好机制的治理效能,卖方竞争削弱了偏好机制的治理效能;信贷契约治理效率随时间逐渐降低,对称市场的签约比率下降最快,卖方竞争市场的守约比率下降最快;买方竞争市场的平均绩效最高,卖方竞争市场的最低;买方竞争市场的投资者占有了较大比例的交易剩余;卖方竞争市场的企业家占有了较大比例的交易剩余。
出处 《中南财经政法大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期39-47,共9页 Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
基金 国家社会科学基金重大招标课题"完善国有控股金融机构公司治理研究"(10ZD&035) 国家自然科学基金项目"社会偏好 激励层次与和谐劳动契约的设计及治理"(70972086) 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"经济治理 二元治理结构与转型期企业行为"(10JJD630002)
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Fehr, E. , Schmidt, K. M. Fairness and Incentives in a Multi-Task Principal-Agent Model[J]. The Scandinavian Journal of Economies, 2004,106 (3) : 453-474.
  • 2Camerer, C. F. Strategizing in the Brain[J]. Science, 2003,300(5626) : 1673-1675.
  • 3Guiso, L. ,Jappelli,T. ,Padula, M. , Pagano, M. Financial Market Integration and Economic Growth in the EU [J]. Economic Policy, 2004,19(40): 523-577.
  • 4Stigler, G. J. , Becker, G. S. De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum[J]. American Economic Review, 1977,67 ( 2 ) : 76-90.
  • 5Fundenberg,D. , Maskin, E. Evolution and Cooperation in Noisy Repeated Games[J]. American Economic Re- view, 1990,80(2) :274-279.
  • 6Gtith,W. ,Schmittberger, R. , Schwarze, B. An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1982,3(4) : 367-388.
  • 7Rahin,M. Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics[J]. American Economic Review, 1993,83 (5) :1281-1302.
  • 8李晓义,李建标.不完备市场的多层次治理——基于比较制度实验的研究[J].经济学(季刊),2009,8(3):1407-1434. 被引量:18
  • 9叶航,汪丁丁,罗卫东.作为内生偏好的利他行为及其经济学意义[J].经济研究,2005,40(8):84-94. 被引量:150
  • 10陈叶烽.亲社会性行为及其社会偏好的分解[J].经济研究,2009,44(12):131-144. 被引量:55

二级参考文献84

  • 1田国强.现代经济学的基本分析框架与研究方法[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):113-125. 被引量:294
  • 2叶航.利他行为的经济学解释[J].经济学家,2005(3):22-29. 被引量:109
  • 3夏纪军.中国的信任结构及其决定——基于一组实验的分析[J].财经研究,2005,31(6):39-51. 被引量:31
  • 4魏光兴.公平偏好的博弈实验及理论模型研究综述[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(8):152-160. 被引量:33
  • 5陈叶烽,叶航.2008:《基于相关实验的社会偏好理论:一个综述》,浙江大学社会科学跨学科中心工作论文.
  • 6Andreoni, J., 1995, " Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle the Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110( 1 ), pp. 1-21.
  • 7Andreonl, J. and Miller, J., 2002, "Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Ahruism", Econometrica, 70(2), pp. 737 753.
  • 8Ashley, R., Ball, S. and Eckel, C., 2009, "Motives for Giving: A Reanalysis of Two Classic Public Goods Experiments", CBEES working paper, School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas.
  • 9Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I. and Piankov, N., 2006, "Decomposing Trust and Trustworthiness", Experimental Economics, 9, pp. 193-208.
  • 10Berg, J., Dickaut, J. and McCabe, K., 1995, "Trust, Reciprocity and Social History", Glmes and Economic Behavior, 10.

共引文献215

同被引文献43

  • 1李劲松,王重鸣.风险偏好类型与风险判断模式的实验分析[J].人类工效学,1998,4(3):17-21. 被引量:18
  • 2徐细雄,万迪昉,淦未宇.行为公司治理研究:公司治理研究的新视角[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(6):11-18. 被引量:4
  • 3Del Missier F, M ntyl T, de Bruin W B. Decision - making Compe- tence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities[ J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2012, 25 (4) :331 - 351.
  • 4Malmendier U, Tate G. Who Makes Acquisitions? CEO Overconfi- dence and the Market's Reaction [ J]. Journal of Financial Econom- ics, 2008, 89 ( 1 ) : 20 - 43.
  • 5Donaldson T. The Epistemic Fault Line in Corporate Governance [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2012, 37 ( 2 ) :256 - 271.
  • 6Camerer C F, Fehr E. When Does "Economic Man" Dominate So- cial Behavior [J]. Science, 2006, 311 (6) :71 - 76.
  • 7Ellingsen T, Johannesson M, Mollerstrom J, et al. Social Framing Effects : Preferences or Beliefs [ J ]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2012, 76(1) :117 -130.
  • 8Andreoni J, Sprenger C. Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 102 (7) :3357 - 3376.
  • 9Jadbabaie A, Molavi P, Sandroni A, et al. Non - Bayesian Social Learning [J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2012, 76( 1 ) :210 - 225.
  • 10Gintis H. A Framework for the Unification of the Behavioral Sci- ences [ J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2007, 30( 1 ):1 -61.

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部