期刊文献+

国际学界对康德《遗著》研究综述 被引量:1

Summarizing the Studies of International Scholars about Opus postumum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《遗著》是国际学界研究热点。研究主要集中在所谓"过渡"问题、"漏洞"问题及其相互关系上。国际学界关于"过渡"的基本观念及其起源问题存在五种观点;关于"漏洞"问题及其与"过渡"问题的关系,也有四种不同的看法。这些研究表明,必须联系《纯粹理性批判》等来理解《遗著》。解释《遗著》对重解康德哲学具有重要意义。 Opus postumum is the focus area of Kantian philosophy. These studies are focus on two problems. That is, the "Transition problem", the "Gap problem" in Kantian, and the relationship to each other. There are five different views about the genesis of the "Transition problem". The "Transition problem"and the "Gap problem"is not the same problem, there are four views about these wo problems and their relationships. These studies indicate that, we should connect Kant' s other works, such as Critique of Pure Reason to interpret Opus postumurn. How to interpret Opus postumum is important to reinterpret Kant's philosophy.
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期109-112,共4页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金项目"康德<遗著>研究"(09BZX040)成果之一
关键词 康德 〈遗著〉 “过渡” “漏洞” Kant Opus postumum "Transition" "Gap"
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1李秋零.康德著作全集(第5卷)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
  • 2Immanuel Kant. Opus postumum. Translated by Eckart Forster and Michael Rosen. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1993.
  • 3Eckart Forster. Kant's Final Synthesis:an Essay on the Opus postu- mum. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press, 2000.
  • 4Michael Frledmam. Kant and the Exact Science. Cambridge, Massa- chucetts, London: Harvard University Press, 1992.
  • 5Howard Caygill. The Transition Problem in the Opus Postumum. in Kant: Making Reason Intuitive. Edited by Kyriaki Goudeli, etal. New York: palgrave macmillan, 2007.
  • 6Michael Friedman. Eckart Forster and Kant's Opus Postumum. In- quiry46 (2) ,2003.
  • 7李秋零.康德著作全集(第4卷)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
  • 8Jeffrey Edwards. Substance, Force, and the possibility of Knowledge. Berkeley and Los Angels, Califomia, London: University of California Press ,2000.
  • 9Kenneth R. Westphal. Kant' s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

共引文献5

同被引文献39

  • 1康德.康德书信百封[M].李秋零译.上海:上海人民出版社,1992:244.
  • 2康德.自然科学的形而上学基础[M].北京:三联书店,1988..
  • 3杨祖陶,邓晓芒.《纯粹理性批判》指要[M].北京:人民出版社,2001:370.
  • 4Caygill Howard. A Kant DictionaryM]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2000.
  • 5Vilem Mudroch. Historical Dictionary of Kant and Kantianism [ M. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press, 2005 .274.
  • 6Gerhard Lehmann. Beitrdge zur Geschichte und In- terpretation der philosophie kants[M]. Berlin. De Gruyter, 1969.
  • 7Erich Adickes. Kants Opus Postumum Dargestellt und BeurteilM. Berlin: Reuther & Reichend, 1920.
  • 8Eckart FOrster. Is there "A Gap" in kant's Critical Sys- tem? [J. Journal of the history of philosophy, 1987.
  • 9Eckart F6rster. Kant's Final Synthesis [M]. Cam- bridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
  • 10Paul Guyer. Beauty, Systematicity, and the High- est Good: Eekart Forster's Kant's Final Synthesis [J]. Inquiry-Oslo, 2003, 46(PART 2):196.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部