期刊文献+

发展中国家参与WTO诉讼活动诉前费用过高的原因及对策分析——以鼓励发展中国家积极参与WTO诉讼为视角 被引量:3

An Analysis on the Causes and Countermeasures of the Excessive Pre-litigation Costs of WTO Litigations by Developing Countries —— From the Perspective of Encouraging Developing Countries’ Participation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 WTO法律制度的法律化、西方法学的晦涩难懂及复杂的程序、相关优惠待遇规定形同虚设及缺乏相应的法律机制和诉讼经验,导致发展中国家参与WTO争端解决活动的诉前费用大幅度提高,严重制约着发展中国家积极参与WTO争端解决活动,难以切实维护自己的合法权益。发达国家在多年的司法实践中,积累了不少充分利用社会资源,有效降低政府的诉前费用负担的经验,值得发展中国家借鉴:发展中国家应建立相应的法律机制,提高自己的能力,充分利用一切资源,切实降低诉前费用。 The legalization, obscure rules and complex procedures of the west jurisprudence, ambiguous regulations of the different and preferential treatment and the lack of lawsuit experiences are the main causes of the high costs of the pre-litigation, and thus restrict developing countries’ participation for the protection of their interests. Developed countries have accumulated rich experiences in their long-time judicial practices, and developing countries should learn from them by establishing necessary legal mechanisms, building their ability to make full use of all resources, and reducing their pre-litigation costs practically.
作者 姜作利
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《世界贸易组织动态与研究(上海对外贸易学院学报)》 北大核心 2012年第1期50-56,共7页 Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
基金 作者主持的山东省2008年社会科学规划研究项目"山东外贸预防欺诈研究"(08JPC009)阶段性成果
关键词 WTO争端解决机制 诉前费用 法律化 WTO dispute settlement mechanism pre-litigation costs legalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Geoffrey Antell, James W. Coleman, "An Empirical Analysis of Wealth Disparities in WTO Disputes: Do Poorer Countries Suffer from Strategic Delay during Dispute Litigation" ?Boston University lnternational Law Journal, 2011, 29: 275.
  • 2Robert Hudec, Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modem GA TT Legal System, New Hampshire: Butterworth Legal Publishers, 199.3:213.
  • 3John H. Jackson, William J. Davey & Alan O. Sykes, Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text, West Publishing Company 5th ed. 2008:272.
  • 4Kristin Bohl, "prob!ems of Developing Country Access t? WTO Dispute Settlement" , Chicago-KentJournM of International & Comparative Law, 2009, 9:146.
  • 5EC-Approval and Marketing Biotech Products, WT/DS291/R, WT/DS292/R, WT/DS293/R,paras. 7.18-7.20.
  • 6叶波,陈靓.WTO争端解决中的专家意见[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究(上海对外贸易学院学报),2011,18(2):43-47. 被引量:2
  • 7Chad P. Pown & Bernard M. Hoekman, "WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector" , Journal of International Economic Law, 2005, 8: 861-862.
  • 8Joost Pauwelyn, "The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement" , International & Comparative Law Quaterly, 2002, 51: 325.
  • 9KristinBohl, "Problems of Developing Country Access to WTO Dispute Settlement" , Chicago-KentJournal of Intemational & ComparativeLaw, 2009, 9:148.
  • 10Asif H. Qureshi: "lntenaational Trade for DeveloPment: The WTO as a Development Institution?" Journal of World Trade, 2009, 43(1 ): 179.

二级参考文献13

  • 1DSU第17条第6款.
  • 2《SPS协定》第5条第1款.
  • 3Appellate Body Report, EC-Asbestos, WT/DS135/AB/R,para.52.3(f).
  • 4Appellate Body Report, EC-Asbestos, WT/DS 135/AB/R,para.52.7(c).
  • 5《SPS协定》第11条第2款.
  • 6DSUI附录4第4条.
  • 7WTC Doc.WT/DSB/RC/1,11 Deccembet 1996.
  • 8Rule of Conduct for the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes,WT/DSB/RC/I, 11 December 1996.
  • 9DSU附录4第6条.
  • 10EC-Honnotes,WT/DS26/AE/R,para.194.

共引文献1

同被引文献38

  • 1毕玉谦.“证明标准研究”,《诉讼法论丛》第四卷,法律出版社1999年版,第439—443页.
  • 2Appellate Body Report, EC-Hormones, WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, 1998, para. 104.
  • 3Scott Andersen, Administration of Evidence in WTO Dispute Settlement Process, in Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement, the First Ten Years 162, 178 (Rufus Yerxa & Bruce Wilson eds. , Cambridge University Press 2005).
  • 4Panel Report, US- Gasoline, WT/DS2/R, 1996, para. 6.5.
  • 5Panel Report, Japan - Alcoholic Beverages Ⅱ, WT/DS1 I/R, 1996, para. 6.28.
  • 6Panel Report, Indonesia- Autos, WT/DS54/R, WT/DS55/R, WT/DS59/R, WT/DS64/R, 1998, para. 14. 278.
  • 7Panel Report, China- Raw Materials, WT/DS394/R, WT/DS395/R, WT/DS398/R, 2012, paras. 7.68, 7. 211, 7. 452, 7. 517- 519, etc.
  • 8Appellate Body Report, EC- Hormones, WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, 1998, para. 104.
  • 9David Unterhalter, The Burden of Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement . Governance, Dispute Settlement & Developing Countries 543 ( Juris Publishing, Inc. 2008).
  • 10Edmond McGovern, International Trade Regulation 74 ( Globefield Press 1995 ).

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部