摘要
文学史写作中有时存在一个模糊、任人评说且具吸附力的"黑洞"空间。食指的诗歌是否为"地下诗歌"?他的诗歌是否真正影响到一代诗人?通过对目前具有代表性的诗歌史和个人写作的文学史梳理,笔者发现论述当中对食指诗歌的传播广度,"第一人"之说、"地下诗人"等说法都存有偏颇,有必要置于历史场域考察食指的写作。经过社会调查与分析指出,文学史材料引用与评价中存在一些值得探讨的问题。
There are sometimes abstract, ambiguous and absorptive "black holes" in the writing of literary history. In the research about "Cultural Revolution" poetry, Shi Zhi has become an iconic figure that we can't be ignored. Literary history also gives important comment on him. Is Shi Zhi's poetry "underground poetry"? Did his poetry really influence a generation of poets? By combing through representative history of poetry and |iterary history written by individual writers, the author of the present article finds that accounts on the wide transmission of Shi Zhi's poetry, sayings that he is "No. 1" or his poetry being underground poetry are biased. Therefore, it is highly necessary to re-examine Shi Zhi's writings in historical context. With the combination of social investigation and analyses the article attempts to discern valuable issues in the citations and evaluation of the written materials of literary history.
出处
《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第1期40-46,共7页
Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词
食指
地下诗歌
文革
文学史
Shi Zhi
underground poetry~ Cultural Revolutiom literary history