期刊文献+

中国农村3~6岁儿童忽视量表的编制及常模的研究 被引量:22

Development of national neglect norms for children aged 3 to 6 years in rural areas of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的开发研制适合中国国情的农村3~6岁儿童忽视评价常模。方法按照多阶段分层整群抽样原则,于2010年11月从全国抽取10个省(直辖市)的84个乡镇,抽样调查3~6岁儿童。共获得常模样本3240名,男童占49.6%(1608/3240),汉族占93.3%(3023/3240)。采用自行设计的问卷进行调查,数据经过项目分析、因素分析、信度分析等统计学处理,删除不符合要求的题项,确定常模量表;通过信度检验和效度检验评价常模的稳定性和可靠性,并采用百分位数法确定量表的评价标准,完成常模的初步研制。结果经过统计处理分析删除不适宜的题项后,最终保留题项数为57个,共包含身体、情感、教育、安全、医疗和社会6个忽视层面。量表各题项的因素负荷量在0.359~0.789之间,达到了统计学相关要求;量表总的Cronbach α系数为0.904,总的劈半信度系数为0.820,6个忽视层面的Cronbaeh α系数介于0.620~0.815之间,6个忽视层面的劈半信度系数介于一0.034~0.789之间,量表的平行信度为0.785,重测信度为0.613;经结构效度、外部效度和内容效度检验,表明量表能够真实有效地反映被评价儿童的受忽视状况;量表判断受试儿童是否受忽视总的界值点为121分。结论本常模具有良好的鉴别力、信度和效度,符合我国国情,操作简便、易行。 Objective To develop the national neglect norms for rural children aged 3 to 6 years, which are suitable for Chinese situations. Methods According to the multi-stage stratified cluster sampling principle,84 towns of 10 provinces or municipalities were selected in China. Children aged 3 to 6 years were surveyed in November 2010, the sample of analysis were 3240 (of whom males were 49. 6% (1608/3240) and the Han nationality were 93.3% (3023/3240)). Questionnaire was designed by authors and deleted items that did not meet the requirements through several statistical analysis methods, such as item analysis method, factor analysis method, reliability analysis method. The reliability analysis and validity analysis were used to test the stability and reliability of the norm. The evaluation criteria of the scale was determined by the percentile method, then the initial development of the norm completed. Results After deleting inappropriate items by statistical processing,finally ,the scale consisted of 57 items, and included 6 neglected dimensions( physical neglect, emotional neglect, educational neglect, safe neglect, medical neglect and social neglect). Its item loadings ranged from 0. 359 to 0. 789, which met the statistical requirements. The scale's total Cronbach α coefficients 0. 904, the total split-half reliability coefficients were 0. 820, the 6 neglect dimensions' Cronbach α coefficients ranged from 0. 620 to 0. 815, the 6 neglect dimensions' split-half reliability coefficients ranged from - 0. 034 to 0. 789, the scale's parallel reliability were 0. 785 and it's re-test reliability were 0. 613. After construct validity, external validity and content validity testing, the result showed that this scale could effectively reflect the real neglected status of children investigated. The total neglect cut-off score of this scale were 121. Conclusion The scale has good stability and reliability. And it adapts Chinese conditions and it's convenient to operate.
出处 《中华预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期16-21,共6页 Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(30872127)
关键词 中国 农村 儿童忽视 儿童伤害 常模 China Rural Child neglect Child maltreatment Norm
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Johanna W. Child neglect literature review. Sydney: NSW Department of Community Services Centre for Parenting & Research, 2005.
  • 2Maughan D, Moore SC. Dimensions of child neglect : an exploration of parental neglect and its relationship with delinquency. Child Welfare, 2010,89(4) :47-65.
  • 3潘建平.不能忽视对儿童的忽视[J].中国全科医学,2007,10(1):6-8. 被引量:36
  • 4Gershater-Molko RM, Lutzker JR, Sherman JA. Assessing child neglect. Aggress Violent Behav ,2003,8 ( 6 ) :563-585.
  • 5Ben Yehuda Y, Attar-Schwartz S, Ziv A, et al. Child abuse and neglect: reporting by health professionals and their need for training. Isr Med Assoc J,2010,12 ( 10 ) : 598-602.
  • 6潘建平,杨子尼,任旭红,王桂香,王惠珊,席卫平,马葆靖,石淑华,弋花妮,傅平,古桂雄,静进,俞红,李琼昭,李威,喻贵清,马西,吴娅莉,黎海芪.中国3~6岁城区儿童忽视常模的研制[J].中国公共卫生,2003,19(1):33-36. 被引量:71
  • 7李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:464

二级参考文献4

  • 1潘建平 顾雪 等.西安市城区儿童忽视调查及影响因素分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2002,10:26-26.
  • 2吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:中国铁道出版,2001..
  • 3关信平.社会研究方法[M]高等教育出版社,2004.
  • 4刘朝杰.问卷的信度与效度评价[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,1997,5(4):174-177. 被引量:213

共引文献553

同被引文献223

引证文献22

二级引证文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部