期刊文献+

中国陆地木材生物危害等级的区域划分 被引量:11

Biological Hazard Classifications and Hazard Map Development for Terrestrial Applications of Wood in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据散白蚁和家白蚁的存在与否,将中国陆地分成无白蚁区、仅有散白蚁区、既有散白蚁又有家白蚁区3个白蚁区域。整合中国腐朽分布图(根据Scheffer气象指数绘制)和白蚁分布区域图,将中国分成四大生物危害区域:区域Ⅰ,低危害区;区域Ⅱ,中等危害区,无白蚁;区域Ⅲ,中等危害区,有散白蚁;区域Ⅳ,严重危害区,既有散白蚁又有家白蚁。木材生物危害区域的划分和相应地图的绘制,既可为建筑设计和施工在提高建筑耐久性、减少不必要浪费的方案设计上提供指南,又可为不同区域采取不同防治白蚁和腐朽危害措施的研究奠定基础。 Four biological hazard zones are proposed for China based on decay hazard and termite hazard.The decay hazards are classified based on the Scheffer Climate Index for exterior aboveground wood elements.The three termite zones are classified based on the presence of Reticulitermes and Coptotermes species:no Reticulitermes or Coptotermes,Reticulitermes species only,both Reticulitermes and Coptotermes species.The four integrated biological zones included:low hazard zone Ⅰ with low decay hazard and no termites,moderate hazard zone Ⅱ with moderate decay hazard but no termites,moderate hazard zone Ⅲ with moderate decay hazard and Reticulitermes,and severe hazard zone Ⅳ with severe decay hazard and both Reticulitermes and Coptotermes.Such a classification aims to pave the way for developing appropriate requirements for wood protection against decay and termites in different regions,and the information can be used by designers and builders as a general guide for designing for certain climate loads and biological hazards to achieve long-term durability.The study also forms background information for further research on how to better protect wood against decay and termites in different areas.
出处 《林业科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期129-135,共7页 Scientia Silvae Sinicae
基金 中央级公益性科研院所基金中国林业科学研究院新技术所基金(CAFINT2011K04)
关键词 白蚁危害分布 腐朽分级 生物危害地图 Scheffer气象指数 termite zone classifications decay hazard classes biological hazard map Scheffer's climate index
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1黄复生,朱世模,平正明,等.2000.中国动物志·昆虫纲·第十七卷·等翅目.北京:科学出版社.
  • 2蒋明亮,王洁瑛,吴讯英,Morris Paul I.中国室外地上木材腐朽危害分级[J].林业科学,2008,44(9):113-117. 被引量:3
  • 3李小鹰,王以燕.白蚁危害及防治在我国的现状与趋势探讨[J].白蚁防治,2003,(8l):18-34.
  • 4Boyd D W. 1961. Weather and building. Natural Research Council Canada Website. Http: //irc. nrc-cnrc, gc. ca/pubs/cbd/cbd014 - print_e, html.
  • 5Cookson L J, Trajstman A C. 2002. Termite survey and hazard mapping. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Technical Report, Clayton South, Vic: CSIRO. Forestry & Forest Products 1996 -2004.
  • 6Leicester R H, Wang C H, Cookson L J. 2003. A risk model for termite attack in Australia. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, IRG/WP 03 - 10468, IRG Secretariat, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 7Masters L W, Wolfe W C. 1974. The use of weather and climatological data in evaluating the durability of building components and materials. Issued by U. S. Department of Commerce and National Bureau of Standards.
  • 8Morris P I,Wang J Y. 2008. A new decay hazard map for north america using the Scheffer index. International Research Group on Wood Preservation Document No. IRG/WP IRG/WP 08 - 10672, IRG, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 9Sauer P. 1987. An annual driven rain index for China. Building and Environment, 22 (4) : 239 - 240.
  • 10Schmidt D, Lam F, Morris P I. et al. 2006. Using neural networks to predict subterranean termite hazard in China. The Third Conference of Pacific Rim Termite Research Group, Guangzhou, P.R. China.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Cornick S M, Dalgliesh W A. 2003a. A moisture index approach to characterizing climates for moisture management of building envelopes. Proceedings of the 9^th Canadian Conference on Building Science and Technology, Vancouver, B C, 383 - 398.
  • 2Cornick S M, Rousseau M Z. 2003b. Understanding the severity of climate loads for moisture-related design of walls. National Research Council of Canada (NRCC), Building Science Insight 2003 Seminar Series (October), 1 - 13.
  • 3Degroot R C. 1982. Assessment of climate index in predicting wood decay in house. Durability of Building Materials, 1 : 169 - 174.
  • 4Foliente G C. 2002. Durability design for wood construction. Forest Products Journal, 52( 1 ) : 10- 19.
  • 5Francis L P, Norton J. 2006. Predicting the decay resistance of timber above-ground. 1. Climate effects. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, IRG/WP 06 - 20330.
  • 6Grinda M, Carey J M. 2004. The COST Euro index for fungal decay: five years results. Paper Preqared for the COST Action E22 Final Workshop, http://www. bfafh. de/inst4/43/pdf/7euindex. pdf.
  • 7Hasegawa M. 1996. Relationships between wood protection and climate indexes. Mokuzai Hozon, 22(5): 2- 9.
  • 8Leicester R H. 2001. Engineered durability for timber construction. Prog Struct Engng Mater, 3: 216- 227.
  • 9Scheffer T C. 1971. A climate index for estimating potential for decay in wood structures above ground. Forest Products Journal, 21(10) : 25 - 31.
  • 10Setliff, E C. 1986. Wood decay hazard in Canada based on Scheffer' s climate index formula. The Forestry Chronicle (October), 456- 459.

共引文献5

同被引文献171

引证文献11

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部