试析山西理工农医高校学报(社科版)与CSSCI扩展版期刊的差距——基于8家高校学报来源指标分析

Analysing the Gap of Shanxi University of Technalogy, Aqriculture and Medicine Journals of Enterig Enlarged CSSCI ——Index Analysis and Thesis Sources of Eight University Journals

根据2011年版《中国期刊引证报告(扩刊版)》提供的数据,选取5家已进入CSSCI扩展版的和山西3家未进入的理工农医高校学报的来源指标进行分析,并与国内6 063种期刊来源指标的总平均值进行对比。结论是:5家学报与山西3家学报相比,在编辑水平、论文质量、交流范围方面均有较强的实力。

By using guoted repost（enlarged edition） from China＇s periodical and selecting 5 journals which have entered enlarged edition CSSCI and 3 journals in Shanxi which have not entered it,and both sides include technology, agriculture and medicine, the author contrasts their source index with average value of 6 063 periodicals in China. And conclusion is that contrasting the 5 journals with the 3 ones, the former journals still have strong potential in editing level, thesis guality and exchange range.