摘要
伴随着跨学科活动的流行,许多新兴学科顺势而生,丰富了学科大家族的成员。当然,一门新兴学科要得到社会的承认,必须有科学的论据,要做科学的分析和理性的论证。虽然,许多学者对学科标准做出了诸多研究,并构建了一定的衡量标准,但是现有标准更像是衡量"一门学科是否成熟的标准",而不是"一门学科是否自立的标准",对于新兴学科有"量刑过重"的嫌疑。因此,在对前人研究成果的考察和反思的基础上,学科自立标准需要横纵相交,动静结合,从而更好地评估"一门学科是否自立"。
With the popularity of interdisciplinary activities, some disciplines is emerging, enrich the academic big family. Of course, if a new discipline to be recognized by society, it must be have a scientific argument, and do the scientific analysis and rational argument. Although many scholars have made a lot of research about academic standards, and built a certain measure, but is a measure of existing standards like "maturity standards of a discipline", rather than "self--sustaining standard of a discipline", which was excessive punishment to an emerging discipline Therefore, the results of previous studies, the study and re- flection, a new discipline needs a self--intersecting vertical and horizontal, static and dynamic binding, and thus better assess "an independent discipline".
出处
《聊城大学学报(社会科学版)》
2011年第6期66-72,共7页
Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition
基金
全国教育科学重点课题(DKA010353):成人教育学专业的建设研究
关键词
学科自立
衡量标准
横纵相交
动静结合
self--discipline
measure standard
vertical and horizontal intersect
dynamic and static combination