摘要
在《存在与书写》①一文中,德里达针对海德格尔《存在与时间》②第82节注释中对哲学史流俗时间观的梳理,对亚里士多德、康德、黑格尔的文本进行了重新的阅读。本文将把德里达的批评重构为三组,并依次指明其中的弊病。
In his article 'ousia et gramme',Derrida criticized Heidegger's notion of time that he presented in Being and Time. Derrida's arguments will be reconstructed in three groups. We'll analyze these arguments in turn,and we will show that the validity of his refutation of Heidegger's notion of time depends unfortunately on the possibility of its reduction into an opposition between a concept and its origin,which is much simpler than the one adopted by Heidegger.
出处
《世界哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期33-47,161,共15页
World Philosophy