期刊文献+

声带息肉及小结患者最小声门面积与声学及空气动力学指标的相关性研究 被引量:11

The Correlation between Acoustic and Aerodynamic Parameters and Minimum Glottal Area of Patients with Vocal Fold Polyps and Nodules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨声带息肉及声带小结患者发声时最小声门面积(minimum glottal area,MGA)与声学及空气动力学指标的相关性。方法对50例正常人(正常组,女30例,男20例)、35例声带息肉患者(息肉组,女20例,男15例)及36例声带小结患者(小结组,均为女性)进行频闪喉镜检查,应用配套KIPS软件计算发/i:/音时MGA;采用计算机语音工作站(Computerized Speech Lab 3700,CSL3700)及空气动力学嗓音功能分析仪(Aero-phone II Voice Function Analyzer)测试息肉组和小结组患者的基频微扰(jitter)、振幅微扰(shimmer)、谐噪比(har-mony to noise ratio,HNR)、平均气流率(mean airflow rate,MFR)、声门阻力(glottal resistance,Rg)、声门下压力(subglottal pressure,SGP),并分别与发声时MGA进行相关性分析。结果正常女性发声时MGA为258.85±116.19,明显小于小结组(463.86±135.25)(P<0.05);正常组发声时MGA为308.25±158.53,明显小于声带息肉组(592.03±299.20)(P<0.05)。小结组发声时MGA与声门下压力无明显相关性(r=0.060,P>0.05);息肉组发声时MGA与声门下压力呈正相关关系(r=0.997,P<0.05)。息肉组及小结组发声时MGA分别与基频微扰(r=0.968,P<0.05和r=0.990,P<0.05)、振幅微扰(r=0.981,P<0.05和r=0.996,P<0.05)及平均气流率(r=0.995,P<0.05和r=0.996,P<0.05)呈正相关,与声门阻力(r=-0.998,P<0.05和r=-0.992,P<0.05)及谐噪比(r=-0.996,P<0.05和r=-0.992,P<0.05)呈负相关。结论声带息肉及声带小结患者发声时MGA增大,声门闭合不良是其声嘶的重要原因之一。 Objective To investigate the correlation between the minimum glottal area(MGA) when the patients phonate and some of the voice and aerodynamic parameters.Methods 50 normal adults and 36 patients with vocal fold nodules and 35 patients with vocal fold polyps were examined with stroboscopy and calculate minimum glottal area with KIPS affiliated to it.Jitter,shimmer and HNR with CSL3700 were estimated;the parameters like MFR,Rg and SGP with Aerophone II Voice Function Analyzer and the software affiliated to it were measared;and the minimum glottal area with other parameters above were compared.Results There was significant difference on MGA between 30 normal women and the patients with nodules(P〈0.05) and also between all of the normal adults and the patients with polyps(P〈0.05).In group with polyps the MGA had positive correlationship with jitter(r=0.968,P〈0.05),shimmer(r=0.981,P〈0.05)and MFR(r=0.995,P〈0.05)and had negative correlationship with Rg(r=-0.998,P〈0.05)and HNR(r=-0.996,P〈0.05),and samilar in nodule group(r=0.990,P〈0.05;r=0.996,P〈0.05;r=0.996,P〈0.05;r=-0.992,P〈0.05;r=-0.992,P〈0.05).The MGA in group of vocal polyps had positive correlationship with SGP(r=0.997,P〈0.05),but the group of nodules had not any obvious correlationship with it(r=0.060,P〈0.05). Conclusion The increase in MGA and incomplete closure of glottis cause much increase in jitter,shimmer,MAF and noise,which is an important reason of hoarseness caused by vocal fold polyp and nodule.
出处 《听力学及言语疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期20-22,共3页 Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
关键词 声带息肉 声带小结 嗓音 空气动力学 最小声门面积 Vocal fold polyp Vocal fold nodule Voice Aerodynamics Minimum glottal area
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Jiang J J, Tao C. The minimum glottal airflow to initiate vocal fold oseillation[J]. J Aeoust Soc Am, 2007,121:2 873.
  • 2魏春生,王薇,陈小玲.计算机图像处理技术对声门图像参数的检测及临床意义[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2000,14(12):540-541. 被引量:10
  • 3Hirano M, Kurita S, Kiyokawa K, et al. Posterior glottis. Morphological study in excised human larynges[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1986,95 : 576.
  • 4杨宝琦,程俊萍.空气动力学在测试呼吸与发声关系中的临床应用[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2000,8(3):152-154. 被引量:20
  • 5Wang CC, Huang HT. Voice aerodynamic analysis of normal Taiwan Residents adults[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2005,104 : 868.
  • 6Sodersten M, Hertegard S, Hammarberg B. Glottal closure, transglottal airflow, and voice quality in healthy middle-aged women[J]. J Voice, 1995,9: 182.
  • 7Granqvist S, Hertegard S, Larsson H, et al. Simultaneous analysis of vocal fold vibration and transglottal airflow: explo ring a new experimental setup[J]. J Voice, 2003,17 : 319.
  • 8Smitheran JR, Hixon TJ. A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production[J].J Speech Hear Disord, 1981,46 : 138.

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1]Koikey, Hirano M, Leden Von H. Vocal initiation:Acoustic and aerodynmic investigations of normal subjects[J]. Folia phoniat, 1967,19:173.
  • 2[2]Stathopoulos, Sapienza. Respiratory and laryngeal function of women and men During vocal intensity variation[J] .J of Speech and Hearing Res, 1993,36:64.
  • 3[3]Sathoponlos Elaine T , Weismer G. Oral airflow and air pressure during speech production. Acomparative study of children,youths and adults[J]. Folia phoniat, 1985,37:152.
  • 4[4]Harm K.Schutte.The efficiency of voice production[M].1981.
  • 5[5]Matthews,Melcon,Jeannette D Hoit,et al.Age and laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production[J],J of Speech and Hearing Disorder,1989,54:282.
  • 6[6]Yanagihara N,Koikey Ledenv Hvon.Phonation and respiration[J].Fo lia phoniat,1965,8: 323.
  • 7[7]Jsshiki N. Vocal intensity and air flowrate[J]. Folia phoniat, 1965,17:92.
  • 8[8]Berg Van Der. Direct and indirect determination of the mean subglottic pressure [J].Folia phoniat,1956,8:1.
  • 9魏春生,王薇,陈小玲,李厚勇,吴梁光.应用动态喉镜图像处理技术定量分析声带振动功能[J].中华医学杂志,1999,79(7):519-520. 被引量:3

共引文献28

同被引文献104

引证文献11

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部