期刊文献+

胆管腔内超声对鉴别胆管狭窄性质的临床价值研究 被引量:3

Diagnostic value of intraductal ultrasonography for biliary stricture
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胆管腔内超声(IDUS)对于判断胆管狭窄性质的临床应用价值。方法收集2006年至2010年因胆管狭窄行胆管腔内超声检查后手术患者,将IDUS结果与手术结果进行对照。结果49例患者中良性狭窄6例,恶性狭窄43例;IDUS判断胆管狭窄性质的敏感度为97.7%(42/43),特异度为83.3%(5/6),阳性预测值为97.7%(42/43),阴性预测值为83.3%(5/6),准确性为95.9%(47/49);显著高于传统的影像学检查(B超、CT及MRCP)。32例患者曾行胆道刷片检查,其中21例诊断为恶性狭窄,准确率为65.6%。所有胆道刷片诊断为恶性狭窄病例均已经被IDUS所诊断。结论胆管腔内超声可以有效判断胆管狭窄的性质,指导临床治疗。ERCP术中IDUS基础上行胆道刷片对于胆管恶性狭窄诊断价值有限,但是对于明确病理诊断有一定的帮助。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of intraductal ultrasonography for the quality of biliary stricture. Methods Data of the patients who had received operation because of biliary stricture after IDUS examination from 2006 to 2010 were collected. IDUS results were compared with those of operation. Results There were 43 cases of malignant strictures and 6 benign strictures in total. The sensi- tivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of intraductal ultrasonography for the quality of biliary stricture were 97.7% ( 42/43 ), 83.3% ( 5/6 ), 97.7% ( 42/43 ), 83.3% (5/6) and 95.9% (47/49), respectively, which were significantly higher than conventional imaging like ultrasound B, CT and MRCP. Twenty one cases in 32 were diagnosed as malignant biliary stricture with cytological brushing, with the diagnostic aceuracy of 65.6%. All cases had been diagnosed by IDUS. Con- clusion Intraductal ultrasonography is of high diagnostic value for biliary stricture. However, cytological brushing based on IDUS is of limited diagnostic value for malignant biliary stricture.
出处 《中华消化内镜杂志》 2012年第1期11-14,共4页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
关键词 腔内超声检查 胆管狭窄 诊断 鉴别 Endosonography Biliary stricture Diagnosis, differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Stavropoulos S, Larghi A, Vema E, et al. Intraductal ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures and no abdominal mass on computed tomography. Endoscopy, 2005, 37: 715-721.
  • 2Menzel J, Poremba C, Died KH, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of bile duct strictures--comparison of intraductal ultrasonography with conventional endosonography. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2000,35:77-82.
  • 3Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Baron TH, Clain JE, et al. Evaluation of indeterminate bile duct strictures by intraductal US. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002,56:372-379.
  • 4Kuroiwa M, Goto H, Hirooka Y, et al. Intraductal uhrasonography for the diagnosis of proximal invasion in extrahepatic bile duct cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 1998,13:715-719.
  • 5Levy MJ, Baron TH, Clayton AC, et al. Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol,2008,103:1263-1273.
  • 6Noda T, Ido K, Ueno N. Transpapillary intraductal ultrasonography(IDUS) of the bile duet without sphineterotomy. Ultrasound Int,1995, 1:141.
  • 7Menzel J, Domschke W. Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) of the pancreato-biliary duct system. Personal experience and review of literature. Eur J Ultrasound, 1999,10 : 105-115.
  • 8熊观瀛,文卫,王翔,杨丽华,蒋国斌,范志宁.腔内超声联合ERCP、CA19—9对胆管良恶性狭窄的诊断[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2009,26(9):493-495. 被引量:3
  • 9Tamada K, Nagai H, Yasuda Y, et al. Transpapillary intraductal US prior to biliary drainage in the assessment of longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc, 2001,53:300-307.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Stavropoulous S, Larghi A, Verna E, et al. Intraductal ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures and no abodominal mass on computed tomography. Endoscopy, 2005,37:715-721.
  • 2Tamada K, Kanai N, Wada S, et al. Utility and limitation of intraductal uhrasonography in distinguishing longitudinal cancer extension along the bile duct from inflammatory wall thickening. Abdom Imaging, 2001,26:623-631.
  • 3Tamada K,Ueno N, Tomiyama T, et al. Characterization of billiary strictures using intraductal ultrasonography: comparision with percutaneous cholangioscopic biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc, 1998,47:341-349.
  • 4Singh saluja S, Sharma R, Pal S, et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant hilar obstructions using laboratory and radiological investigations : A prospective study. HPB ( Oxford ), 2007, 9 : 373-382.
  • 5Akdogan M, Parlak E, Kayhan B, et al. Are serum and biliary carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 determinations reliable for differentiation between benign and malignant biliary disease? Turk J Gastroenterul, 2003,14:181-184.
  • 6Mann DV, Edwards R, Ho S, et al. Elevated tumour marker CA19-9 : clinical inlerprelation and influence of obstructive jaundice. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2000,26:474-479.
  • 7Rogoveanu I, Gheonea DI, Saftoiu A, et al. The role of imaging methds in identifying the causes of extrahepatic cholestasis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2006, 15:265-271.
  • 8金杰,丁文彬,袁瑞凡,钱俊波.经皮胆管内超声诊断阻塞性黄疸的临床价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2007,15(6):449-451. 被引量:5
  • 9金震东,黄建伟,湛先保,李兆申,邹晓平,许国铭.胆总管下段癌的腔内超声与ERCP诊断价值比较[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(5):656-658. 被引量:9

共引文献2

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部