期刊文献+

重组人生长激素治疗特发性矮小12个月疗效评估 被引量:4

Effect of recombinant human growth hormone therapy on idiopathic short stature patients:12 months follow-up
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析重组人生长激素(rhGH)对特发性矮小(ISS)患儿的治疗效果和影响因素,为寻求优化治疗效果的途径提供参考依据。方法回顾性分析2003年2月至2011年7月在首都儿科研究所生长发育门诊确诊为ISS患儿的临床资料,依据是否予rhGH治疗分为rhGH组和对照组。以身高标准差变化(ΔHtSDS)和生长速度(GV)作为评估指标进行疗效和影响因素分析。分析治疗期间骨龄、身高年龄及胰岛素样生长因子(IGF-1)水平的变化。结果 rhGH组35例,对照组33例进入分析。①rhGH组治疗前、治疗后12个月HtSDS呈增长趋势(P<0.05);对照组均未见升高趋势。治疗后0~3个月的ΔHtSDS水平为(0.22±0.13),治疗后~6、~9和~12个月分别为(0.20±0.10)、(0.12±0.14)和(0.14±0.15),呈降低趋势,但差异无统计学意义。治疗后0~3个月GV为(10.78±2.70)cm·year-1,治疗后~6、~9和~12个月分别为(10.52±2.44)、(8.31±2.78)和(8.50±2.29)cm·year-1,呈降低趋势,但差异无统计学意义。治疗后0~6个月ΔHtSDS和GV水平均显著高于~12个月[ΔHtSDS:(0.43±0.20)vs(0.27±0.24),GV:(10.48±2.17)vs(8.48±2.39)cm·year-1]。②治疗后12个月的ΔHtSDS水平与治疗开始时的年龄呈负相关,与治疗后0~3个月的ΔHtSDS呈正相关;治疗后12个月的GV水平与治疗前的GH峰值和治疗后3个月的GV水平呈负相关。③治疗后1年青春期前、青春早中期和青春后期ΔHtSDS差异总体上有统计学意义(P=0.016),其中青春期前显著高于青春早中期和青春后期;GV差异无统计学意义。④rhGH组治疗后12个月的骨龄变化差异无统计学意义,身高年龄显著高于对照组。⑤rhGH组IGF-1水平在治疗后1个月升高较明显,之后升高趋势减缓。结论 rhGH用于ISS患儿的治疗应尽量选择青春期前;治疗后3个月的效果可作为第1年治疗效果的预测因素;rhGH治疗不会使ISS患儿骨龄明显提前。 Objective To analyze the effect of GH therapy on idiopathic short stature (ISS) patients and the influential factors. Methods Patients who accepted rhGH therapy and regularly revisited were chosen as rhGH group, and patients who didn't accept rhGH therapy as control group. Growth velocity (GV) and increment in height SDS (AHtSDS) were used as outcome variables of growth responses to rhGH therapy. Then the effect and influential factors or the changes on those untreated such as bone age, height age were retrospectively analyzed during the follow-up. Results Thirty-five patients were recruited in rhGH group and 33 patients in control group. The AHtSDS and GV of patients in rhGH group during the first 3 months, - 6 months, - 9 months, -12 monthswere (0.22-+0. 13), (0.20 +0. 10), (0. 12-+0. 14), (0. 14 +0. 15) and (10.78 +2.70) cm, ( 10.52 -+ 2.44) cm, (8.31 + 2.78 ) cm, ( 8.50 -+ 2.29) cm respectively. The height increments in the first 6 months and 6-12 months were 5.24 cm (0.43 SDS) and 4.24 cm (0.26 SDS), it was 9.54 cm (0.68 SDS) in the first year and 7.00 cm (0.17 SDS) in the second year. According to the simple correlation analysis, it was found that AHtSDS in the first year was negatively correlated with patients' age and positively correlated with AHtSDS in 3 months after treatment, GV levels in first year were negatively correlated with the peak of GH level and GV in 3 months after treatment. There were significant differences in AHtSDS among prepubertal, midpubertal and postpubertal children one year after treatment( P = 0. 016 ) , AHtSDS was significantly higher in prepnberty than midpnberty and postpuberty. But there was no signifieanl difference in (3V. Besides, the increment of height age in rh(;H group was significantly larger than control group, but there was no significant differenee in increment of bone age between two groups. The levels of IGF-I elevated in rhGH group signigicantly 1 month after treatment and slowed down afterwards. Conclusions For ISS patients, therapy should be started at an earlier age ,at least before the puberty in order to achieve better cost-effect ratio. The therapeutic effect in the first 3 months may be a good predictor of one year therapeutic efficacy. While the ,'hGlt therapy didn't significantly accelerate the increment of bone age of patients.
出处 《中国循证儿科杂志》 CSCD 2012年第1期63-67,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence Based Pediatrics
关键词 特发性矮小 重组人生长激素 疗效 影响因素 Idiopathic short stature Recombinant human growlh hormone Therapeutic effect Influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献54

共引文献33

同被引文献35

  • 1王德芬.警惕生长激素治疗特发性矮小症出现误区[J].国外医学(内分泌学分册),2005,25(4):228-229. 被引量:3
  • 2吴勤勇,朱惠娟,李欣,潘慧,张殿喜,龚凤英,邓洁英,史轶蘩.特发性生长激素缺乏性矮小症在重组人生长激素治疗1年后身体构成的变化[J].中国新药杂志,2006,15(19):1676-1679. 被引量:5
  • 3Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of chil-dren with idiopathic short stature:a summary of the GrowthHormone Research Socicty, the Lawson Wilkins PediatricEndocrine Society, and the European Society for PaediatricEndocrinology Workshop[j]. Clin Endocrinol Metab , 2008,93(11):4210-4217.
  • 4李辉.中阔0-18岁儿童青少年生长图表[M].1版.上海:第二军医大学出版社,2009,12.
  • 5Pedicelli S, Peschiaroli E, Violi .E,et al. Controversies in thedefinition and treatment of idiopathic short statureCISS)[J].Clin Res Pediatr Endo crinoL ,2009 ,1(3): 105-115.
  • 6Deodati A.Cianfarani S. Impact of growth hormone therapyon adult height of children with idiopathic short stature:sys-tematic review[J]. BMJ ,2011,11: 342.
  • 7Ranke MB,Lindberg A,Price DAyet al. Age at growth hor-mone therapy start and first-year responsiveness to growthhormone are major determinants of height outcome in idio-pathic short stature[J], Horm Res,2007 ,68(2) : 53-62.
  • 8Bakker B,Franc J,Anhalt H, et al. Height velocity targetsfrom the national cooperative growth study for first-yeargrowth hormone responses in short children[JJ. Clin Endo-crinol Metab,2008,93(2) : 352-357.
  • 9Ross J , Lee PA,Gut K,et al. Factors influencing the one-andtwo-year growth response in children treated with growthhormone:analysis from an observational study[J]. Int J Pe-diatr Endocrinol,2010,4946-4956.
  • 10黄晓萍,王伟.儿童特发性矮小临床治疗新进展[J].临床儿科杂志,2008,26(5):438-441. 被引量:19

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部