期刊文献+

宪法判断的正当化功能 被引量:12

Legitimating Function of Constitutional Decision
原文传递
导出
摘要 对特定国家行为的合宪性作出具有法律效力的宪法判断,有助于实现基本权利的保障和法律体系的统一。除此之外,对国家行为的正当化也是宪法判断所能实现的一个重要功能。宪法是法律体系的正当性基础,通过对法律规范作出合宪判断,可以直接强化其宪法上的正当性,而即便是违宪判断,通过法律技术的运用和处理,也可以实现对特定法律规范或国家行为的正当化功能。 There are different models of constitutional review all over the world, but the two main typical tasks of the institution of constitutional review are as follows. One is to protect the individuals basic human rights granted in the constitution from the infringement by the governmental organ. The other is to safeguard the constitutionality and unification of the legal system. In addition, to justify certain state action is also one of the most important by--products of constitutional review. According to the fundamental principle of constitutionalism, state action is justifiable only when it is done in accordance with the constitution. The constitutional decision may enhance the legitimacy of governmental actions, and further more it is a basic factor according to the principle of rule of law. In this regard, Charles L. Black argued that the legitimating function of the judicial review of constitutionality is of immense --perhaps vital-- importance to the nation and the government of limited powers. In fact, the decisions in the majority of the constitutional cases were approved. From the perspective of comparative law, even the unconstitutional decision can provide legitimate foundation for some other state actions. As the case in the U.S. has shown, the unconstitutional decision is easily available for use as a seal of legitimacy for countless other controversial political acts. When it comes to the function of constitutional decision, most of the constitutional scholars attach great importance to the function of check and balance. In this aspect, the theory of legitimating function provides a new perspective. Given the special political and social context in China, research on the legitimating function of constitutional decision is an urgent task for constitutional theory and constitutional jurisprudence.
作者 翟国强
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期77-87,共11页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 宪法判断 合宪性 合宪判断 违宪判断 constitutional decision, legitimacy, constitutionality, unconstitutional decision
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1Henry Monaghan, Constitutional Adjudication : The Who and When, 82 Yale Law Journal 1365 (1973).
  • 2[日]芦部信喜.《宪法诉讼的现代展开》,有斐阁1982年版,第4页以下.
  • 3蔡定剑.中国宪法实施的私法化之路[J].中国社会科学,2004(2):56-67. 被引量:139
  • 4Robert Dahl, Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker, 6 Journal of Public Law 279-295 (1957).
  • 5Charles L. Black Jr., The People and the Court, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1960, p. 52, pp. 66-67.
  • 6Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch, Bobbs-Merill Company, Inc., 1962, p. 29.
  • 7[日]芦部信喜.《宪法诉讼理论》,有斐阁1973年版,第15页.
  • 8F. L. Morton, Judicial Review in France: A Comparative Analysis, 36 The American Journal of Comparative Law 89-110 (1988).
  • 9Frank I. Michelman, Constitutional Legitimation for Political Acts, 66 The Modern Law Review 1- 15 (2003).
  • 10梁启超.《立宪法议》,载《饮冰室合集1·饮冰室文集之五》,中华书局1988年版.

二级参考文献41

  • 1王叔文.论宪法实施的保障[J].中国法学,1992(6):15-22. 被引量:52
  • 2张翔.功能适当原则与宪法解释模式的选择——从美国“禁止咨询意见”原则开始[J].学习与探索,2007(1):112-117. 被引量:25
  • 3Lewan, supra note 166 at 573.
  • 4Horan, Contemporary Constitutionalism and Legal Regal Relationship between Individuals, p. 251.
  • 5张千帆.《西方宪政体系》(下册)[M].中国政法大学出版社,2001年.第449页.
  • 6王涌.“论宪法与私法的关系”[EB/OL].“宪法文本”网站,.
  • 7PeterEQuint.“德国宪政理论上的言论自由和私法自治”[Z].,..
  • 8李忠 章忱.“司法机关与宪法适用”[A].张庆福主编.《宪政论丛》:第3卷[C].法律出版社,2003年.第525页.
  • 9张庆福.《宪政论丛》(第3卷)[M].,.第521页.
  • 10李忠 章忱.“司法机关与宪法适用”[M].,.第525、522页.

同被引文献188

引证文献12

二级引证文献165

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部