摘要
春秋战国,儒墨颉颃,百家争鸣。即使是在《墨子》兴盛一时的战国,《墨子》研究亦未完全脱离援墨注儒的藩篱。儒学为宗,《墨子》绝而不息,牢固的儒家正统观念更使得后世的《墨子》研究者很难跳出援墨注儒的窠臼。以致于后世学者立足儒家学说,看墨必提儒、说墨必比儒,赞墨必赞儒。
The Spring and Autumn and the Warring States periods is a period of contention of a hundred school of thoughts, among whom were Confucianism and Mohism. Even in the Warring States period, in which Mozi was popular, study on it could not completely get rid of the effection of studying Mohism for interpreting Confucianism purp . Because the Confucianism occupied the dominant role, the Mohism seemingly withered (actually, it still kept alive). It is the inveteracy of thought that Confucianism is the orthodox ideas that limits the later scholars of Mozi study in the thinking mode of studying Mohism for interpreting Confucianism purpose. Consequently, later scholars fall into a fixed thinking pattern of studying Mozi on the basis of Confucianism.
出处
《温州大学学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第1期37-42,共6页
Journal of Wenzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词
《墨子》
援墨注儒
儒墨关系
Mozi
Studying Mohism for Interoperating Confucianism Purpose
Relations of Confucianism and Mohism