期刊文献+

十字花科与豆科作物对微囊藻毒素耐受性差异的比较

Comparison on the Tolerance of Cruciferous Crops and Leguminous Crops to Microcystin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]研究十字花科与豆科作物对微囊藻毒素(MC)耐受性的差异。[方法]以十字花科作物典型作物油菜、小白菜、甘蓝与豆科典型作物黄豆、豌豆、蚕豆为材料,检测它们在不同浓度MC暴露条件下的生长发育情况,检测指标包括发芽率、株高、叶绿素等。[结果]十字花科作物中油菜与小白菜受MC影响较大,甘蓝受影响较小,而豆科作物普遍受影不大。[结论]豆科作物比十字花科作物对MC耐受性更强,在受微囊藻毒素污染地区可以优先种植豆科作物。 [Objective] To study the differences in the tolerance of leguminous crops and cruciferous crops to microcystin(MC).[Method] The cruciferous typical crops ― oilseed rapes,pakchois,cabbages and leguminous typical crops-soybeans,peas and broad beans were selected as the materials to test the effects of MC of different concentrations on the germination,growth and development of leguminous crops and cruciferous crops.The measuring indicators included germination rate,plant height,chlorophyll,etc.[Result] The MC had great effects on the oilseed rape and pakchois of cruciferous crops,and smaller effects on cabbage,while the leguminous crops were generally not affected.[Conclusion] Leguminous crops are more tolerant to MC than cruciferous crops and more preferential in MC polluted regions.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 2012年第3期1641-1644,共4页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 河南省科技攻关项目(No.092102110105) 河南工程学院博士基金资助项目(No.D09010) 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(No.2009ZX07104-005-03 2009ZX07102-003-004 2008ZX07101-007.) 中科院水生生物研究所开放性实验室项目(No.2009FBZ09)
关键词 微囊藻毒素 豆科 十字花科 耐受性 差异 Microcystin Cruciferous crops Leguminous crops Tolerance Difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1CARMICHAEL W.Cyanobacteria secondary metabolites:the cyanotoxins[J].J Appl Bacterial,1992,72:445-459.
  • 2WATANABE M F,TSUJI K,WATANABE Y,et al.Release of heptapeptidetoxin(microcystin)during the decomposition process of Microcystisaeruginosa[J].Nat Toxins,1992,1:48-53.
  • 3POURIA S,ANDRABE A,BARBOSA J,et al.Fatal microeystin intoxica-tion in haemolialysis unit in Caruaru,Brazil[J].The Lancet,1998,352:21-26.
  • 4JOCHIMISEN E M,CARMICHAEL W W,CARDO D M,et al.Liver failureand death after exposure to microcystins at a hemodialysis center in Brazil[J].New Engng J Med,1998,338(13):873-878.
  • 5LIU B B,GONG Y,XIAO B D,et al.A laboratory study on risk assessmentof microcystin-RR in cropland[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2008,86:566-574.
  • 6MCELHINEY J,LAWTON L A,LEIFERT C.Investigations into the inhibi-tory effects of microcystins on plant growth,and the toxicity of plant tis-sues following exposure[J].Toxicon,2001,39:1411-1420.
  • 7PFLUGMACHCR S,HOFMANN J,I-lIIBNER B.Effects on growth andphysiological parameters in wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)grown in softand irrigated with cyanobacterial toxin contaminated water[J].Environ-mental Toxicology&Chemistry,2007,26(12):2710-2716.
  • 8CHEN J,SONG L,DAI J,et al.Effects of microcystins on the growth andthe activity of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase of rape(Brassica na-pus L.)and rice(Oryza sativa L.)[J].Toxicon,2004,43(4):393-400.
  • 9GEHRINGER M M.Microcystin-LR and okadaic acid-induced cellulareffects:a dualistic response[J].FEBS Letters,2004,557(1/3):1-8.
  • 10SUVIJRVPENP,CATHARINA LUNBDERG-NIINIST,LISA SPOOF,et al.Effects of microcystins on broccoli and mustard,and analysis ofaccumulated toxin by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry[J].Toxi-con,2007,49(6):865-874.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部