摘要
《刑法》第196条第3款规定的"盗窃信用卡并使用的,依照本法第264条规定定罪处罚"属于想象竞合犯。《刑法》第171条第3款属于吸收犯的情况,不属于牵连关系。行为人自己伪造、变造国库券或者国家发行的其他有价证券,然后用自己伪造的有价证券进行诈骗活动的,应成立牵连犯,属于目的行为和手段行为的牵连。《刑法》第197条的规定实质上是一个牵连关系和一个法条竞合关系,而不是结合犯。另外,将从重情节也理解为结合犯的观点是值得商榷的。
According to Article 196（3） ＂Whoever steals a credit card and uses it shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions in Article 264 of this Law.＂,such act belongs to imaginative joinder of offenses.In Article 171（3） applies to assimilating instead of implicating crime.But whoever forges or alters treasury certificates or any other negotiable securities issued by the State,and commits fraud with the forged negotiable securities shall be convicted as implicated offence,the implication of purposeful behavior and means behavior.Article 197 is actually concerning the implication and coincidence of articles,rather than combinative crime.Moreover,it deserves reconsideration that crimes worth heavier punishment is taken as implicated crimes.
出处
《河北经贸大学学报（综合版）》
2011年第4期34-36,共3页
Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business(Comprehensive Edition)
基金
湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(2010YBB330)
关键词
金融犯罪
罪数
法条竞合
牵连犯
结合犯
financial crime
the quantity of crime
coincidence-of-articles crime
implicated offence
combinative crime
