期刊文献+

边缘性人格障碍对抑郁症患者临床疗效的影响 被引量:5

Clinical effects of depressive patient with borderline personality disorder tendency
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨有边缘性人格障碍倾向的抑郁症与单纯抑郁症患者之间短期临床疗效的差异。方法采用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD17)、14项汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA14)在治疗前、治疗后第2,4周末分别对22例有边缘性人格障碍倾向的抑郁症患者(BPD组)和22例单纯抑郁症患者(对照组)进行评定。结果第2周末,BPD组HAMD17总分、情绪因子分和认知障碍因子分分别为(15.5±4.50)分、(6.32±1.70)分、(1.09±0.75)分,高于对照组[分别为(11.7±3.75)分、(4.77±2.18)分、(0.59±0.73)分],均差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05);第4周末,HAMD17总分、情绪因子分、睡眠因子分、精神焦虑因子分、躯体焦虑因子分、认知障碍因子分分别为(11.73±4.26)分,(5.41±2.13)分、(1.68±1.17)分、(1.91±.92)分、(1.95±1.10)分、(0.73±0.63)分,高于单纯抑郁组[分别为(5.91±2.74)分、(3.00±1.54)分、(0.77±.69)分、(1.05±0.38)分、(0.82±0.85)分、(0.18±0.40)分],均差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05);BPD组与对照组HAMA14总分减分和各因子分减分在第2,4周末差异无统计学意义(均P〉0.05);第4周末,BPD组HAMD17、HAMA14总分减分率[分别为(50±16)%、(58±12)%],低于对照组分别为[(74±11)%、(74±10)%],均差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05);BPD组与对照组在HAMD17疗效上的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论有边缘性人格障碍倾向会影响抑郁症临床症状的缓解。 Objective To explore the borderline personality disorder(BPD) tendency happened in depressive patients and to determine the effects of BPD tendency in remission. Methods Depressive patients with BPD tendency (BPD group, n = 22 )and pure depressive patients (control group, n = 22 ) were assessed with Hamilton depression scale(HAMD) and Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA) at baseline and on weeks 2,4. Results On week 2, the total score of HAMD, two factors' ( emotion and cognitive disorder) scores of HAMD of the BPD group ( ( 15.5 ± 4.50), (6.32 ± 1.70) , ( 1.09 ± 0.75 ) respectively) significantly higher than the counterparts of the control group, which were ( 11.7 ± 3.75 ) , (4.77 ± 2.18 ) , ( 0.59 ± 0.73 ) respectively ( all P 〈 0.05 ). And on week 4 ,the total score of HAMD and all five factors' scores of HAMD of the BPD group were( ( 11.73 ±4.26 ) , ( 5.41 ±2.13) ,( 1.68 ±1.17) ,(1.91 ±0.92 ) ,(1.95 ± 1.10), (0.73 ±0.63) respectively)) significantly higher than the counterparts of the control group,which were (5.91 ± 2.74 ) , (3.00 ± 1.54) , (0.77 ± 0.69 ) , (1.05 ± 0.38 ), (0.82 ± 0.85 ), (0.18 ± 0.40) respectively( all P 〈 0.05 ). The control group significantly exceed the BPD group on the total score reduction ratio of HAMD and HAMA ( all P〈 0.05 ). They have significant difference on clinical effects (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The borderline personality disorder tendency in depression affects clinical symptoms remission.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期40-43,共4页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 基金项目:南京市卫生局科技发展项目(YKK08041)
关键词 边缘性人格障碍 抑郁症 疗效 对照研究 Borderline personality disorder Depression Clinical effects Matched study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1傅文青,姚树桥.2592例大学生人格诊断问卷(PDQ^(+4))测试结果分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(9):621-623. 被引量:51
  • 2戴云飞,肖泽萍,王振,张海音,陈珏,邹政,何燕玲,赵介城,张明园.人格障碍诊断问卷(SCID-Ⅱ)第2版的信度和效度[J].上海精神医学,2006,18(1):1-4. 被引量:55
  • 3Cheour M, Ellouze F, Zine I, et al. Beck Inventory depression assessment in chronic pain patients [J].Tunis Med, 2008, 86 (12): 1074-1078.
  • 4Elliott TE, Renier CM, Palcher JA. Chronic pain, depression, and quality of life: correlations and predictive value of the SF-36 [J].Pain Med, 2003, 4 (4): 331 - 339.
  • 5Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, et al. Grading the severity of chronic pain [J] . Pain, 1992, 50 (2) : 133 - 149.
  • 6Scascighini L, Sprott H. Chronic nonmalignant pain: a challenge for patients and clinicians[J]. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol, 2008, 4 (2): 74-81.
  • 7Sarda J Jr, Nicholas MK, Asghari A, et al. The contribution of self-efficacy and depression to disability and work status in chronic pain patients: a comparison between Australian and Brazilian samples[J].Eur J Pain, 2009, 13 (2) : 189 - 195.
  • 8Nicholas MK, Coulston CM, Asghari A, et al. depressive symptoms in patients with chronic pain [ J ] .Med J Aust, 2009, 190 (7):S66-70.
  • 9Rubin JJ. Psychosomatic pain: New in sights and management strategies[J].South Med J, 2005, 98 (11): 1099 - 1100.
  • 10辛显福 贾汝凤.以慢性疼痛为主的隐匿性抑郁症.当代医学(学术版),2008,(6):74-75.

共引文献74

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部