期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

组织公平补救问题研究现状及展望 被引量：1

原文传递
导出
摘要 组织不公平不仅会破坏员工与组织的关系,还会阻碍组织效能的实现,因而组织有必要关注组织公平补救问题。本文回顾了与组织公平补救的相关理论模型,指出了组织公平补救的策略、心理机制等研究近况,展望了未来研究的可能方向。
作者 程延园 杨柳
机构地区 中国人民大学
出处 《中国人力资源开发》 北大核心 2012年第2期11-15,共5页 Human Resources Development of China
关键词 组织公平补救 不公平 策略 心理机制
分类号 F272.92 [经济管理—企业管理]
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1陈阅,时勘,罗东霞.组织内信任的维持与修复[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(4):664-670. 被引量：37
  • 2Andiappan, M., & Trevi?o, L. K. Beyond righting the wrong: supervisor-subordinate after an injustice. Human Relations, 2011, 64(3): 359-386.
  • 3Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cumming, L. L. Causal accounts and managing organizational.conflict: is it enough to say it's not my fault? Communication Research, 1988, 15(4): 381-399.
  • 4Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(2): 445-464.
  • 5Brockner, J., DeWitt, R. L., Grover, S., & Reed, T. When it is especially important to explain why factors affecting the relationship between managers' explanations of a layoff and survivors' reactions to the layoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1990, 26: 389-407.
  • 6Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. Justice at the millennium: a meta- analytic review of 25 years of organizational research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(3): 425-445.
  • 7Cropanzano, R., Byme, Z., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social.
  • 8De Cremer, D., & Schouten, B. C. When apologies for injustice matter: the role of respect. European Psychologist, 2008, 13(4): 239-247.
  • 9Dirks, K. T., Lewicki, I.. J., & Zaheer, A. Repairingrelationships within and between organizations: building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(1): 68-84.
  • 10Dirks, K. T., Kim,P. H., Ferrin, D. L., & Cooper, C. D. Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011, 114: 87-103.

二级参考文献49

  • 1王晓一,李薇,杨美荣.大学生人际信任与自我和谐的相关研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,16(6):646-647. 被引量：34
  • 2郑伯.企业组织中上下属的信任关系[J].社会学研究,1999(2):24-39. 被引量：170
  • 3简佳,唐茂芹,彭燕.人际信任与大学生心理健康的关系[J].国际精神病学杂志,2007,34(2):122-125. 被引量：12
  • 4Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 295-305.
  • 5Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653-668.
  • 6Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5), 497-513.
  • 7Costigan, R. D., Ilter, S. S., & Berman J. J. (1998). A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(3), 303-317.
  • 8Crant, J. M. & Bateman, T. S. (1993). Assignment of credit and blame for performance outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 36(1), 7-27.
  • 9Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000).The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 563-576.
  • 10Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450-467.

共引文献36

同被引文献36

  • 1Andiappan,M,Trevio,L.K. Beyond righting the wrong:Supervisor-subordinate reconciliation after an injustice[J].Human Relations,2011,(03):359-386.
  • 2Blader,S.L,Tyler,T.R. Testing and extending the group engagement model:Linkages between social identity,procedural justice,economic outcomes,and extra-role behavior[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2009,(02):445-464.
  • 3Bolton,L,Keh,H.T,Alba,J.W. How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2010,(03):564-576.
  • 4Bottom,W.P,Gibson,K,Daniels,S.E,Murnighan,J.K. When talk is not cheap:Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation[J].Organization Science,2002,(05):497-513.
  • 5Chiaburu,D.S,Marinova,S.V. What determines employees' role perceptions? An instrumentality-based explanation[J].Public Personnel Management,2012,(01):45-46.
  • 6De Cremer,D,Schouten,B.C. When apologies for injustice matter:The role of respect[J].European Psychologist,2008,(04):239-247.
  • 7De Jong,B.A,Elfring,T. How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity,monitoring and effort[J].Academy of Management Journal,2010,(03):535-549.
  • 8Desmet,P.T.M,De Cremer,D,van Dijk,E. In money we trust? The use of financial compensations to repair trust in the aftermath of distributive harm[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2011,(02):75-86.
  • 9Desmet,P.T.M,De Cremer,D,van Dijk,E. On the psychology of financial compensations to restore fairness transgressions:When intentions determine value[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2011,(01):105-115.
  • 10Desmet,P.T.M,De Cremer,D,van Dijk,E. Trust recovery following voluntary or forced financial compensations in the trust game:The role of trait forgiveness[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2011,(03):267-273.

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

中国人力资源开发
2012年 第2期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部