期刊文献+

动力髋螺钉上方加抗旋转螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的生物力学特点:32例回访资料回顾 被引量:1

Biomechanical characteristics of dynamic hip screws and anti-rotational screws for intertrochanteric fractures:A data review of 32 cases follow-up
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:单纯应用动力髋螺钉固定股骨转子间骨折其抗旋转能力及骨折稳定性均欠佳。目的:观察动力髋螺钉结合抗旋转螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的生物力学特点。方法:采用在动力髋螺钉上方加1枚抗旋转螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折38例患者。对其中32例接受切开复位动力髋螺钉结合抗旋转螺钉置入固定且病历随访资料完整的股骨转子间骨折患者进行回顾性分析。结果与结论:32例获随访3~18个月。骨折平均愈合时间18.1周,无内固定物松动、断裂及再骨折发生。按黄公怡疗效评定标准进行疗效评定,其中优21例,良8例,中3例,差0例,优良率90.6%。结果证实,动力髋结合抗旋转螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折固定牢靠,抗旋转作用强。 BACKGROUND: Anti-rotation ability and fracture stability of using simple dynamic hip screws for femoral intertrochanteric fractures fixation is poor. OBJECTIVE: To observe the biomechanical characteristics of dynamic hip screws and anti-rotational screws for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who used dynamic hip screws and anti-rotational screws for femoral intertrochanteric fracture were selected. Thirty-two patients who received reduction and fixation with dynamic hip screws and anti-rotational screws for femoral intertrochanteric fracture were retrospective analysed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Totally 32 cases were followed up for average 12.6 months (ranged from 6 to18 months). All the patients obtained bone union in average 18.1 weeks. There were no cases with implant loosening or refracture. According to Harris rating scale, the excellent and good rate was 90.6%, evaluation 21 cases in excellent, 8 cases in good, 3 cases in average and 0 case in poor. Internal fixation of dynamic hip screws and anti-rotational screws are suitable for femoral intertrochanteric fracture and this method have characteristics of large definitive rotational stability and rigid fixation.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第52期9869-9872,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献36

  • 1《骨折》[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(7). 被引量:37
  • 2周跃,张峡,梅芳瑞,吴远清.加压滑动鹅头钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床与实验研究[J].中华创伤杂志,1995,11(1):7-9. 被引量:36
  • 3范卫民,陶松年,王道新,殷国勇,刘锋.股骨转子间骨折内固定物的力学研究及疗效观察[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(9):581-583. 被引量:77
  • 4王亦璁 孟继懋(等).骨与关节损伤[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1992.674.
  • 5Koval KJ, Cantu RV. Intertrochanteric fractures// Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Charles MCB. Rockwood & Green's fractures in adults. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006: 1804-1805.
  • 6Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1992, 74: 352-357.
  • 7Aune AK, Ekeland A, Odegaard B, et al. Gamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures. 15 reoperations in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patients. Acta Orthop Scand, 1994, 65: 127-130.
  • 8Osnes EK, Lofthus CM, Faleh JA, et al. More postoperative femoral fractures with the gamma nail than the sliding screw plate in the treatment of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand, 2001, 72: 252-256.
  • 9Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, et al. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1991, 73: 330-334.
  • 10Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK. A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1993, 75: 789-793.

共引文献995

同被引文献5

  • 1S.Terry Canale. Camplell’s Orthopaclics[M].1998.2151-2189.
  • 2Joseph DZ. Current Concepts:Hip Fracture[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1996,(23):1519-1525.
  • 3Adams CI,Robinson CM,Court-Brown C,McQueen MM. Prospec-tive randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic hip screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractured femur[J].Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,2001,(06):394-400.
  • 4娄湘红;杨晓霞.实用骨科护理学[M]北京:科学出版社,2006202.
  • 5Canale ST;卢世璧;王继芳;王岩.坎贝尔骨科手术学[M]济南:山东科学技术出版社,20052758-2822.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部