期刊文献+

拉伸指数与单指数模型DWI对单侧大脑前循环动脉狭窄者的评价 被引量:5

Diffusion weighted imaging with stretched-exponential model and mono-exponential model in patients with cerebral anterior circulation arteriostenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:以单侧大脑前循环动脉不同程度狭窄的患者为研究对象,比较DWI的拉伸指数模型、单指数模型的各参数值在左、右半球之间的差异。方法:对申请头颈部动脉CTA检查的患者,在无MRI检查禁忌及患者知情同意的情况下行单指数和拉伸指数模型的扩散加权检查。采用的b值序列是:0、5、10、20、50、100、200、400、600、1000、1500、2000、3000s/mm2,通过工作站计算表观扩散系数(ADC)值、分布扩散系数(DDC)值和α值三个参数。根据颈内动脉系统是否狭窄及狭窄程度将患者分为A(无狭窄)、B(轻、中度狭窄)、C(重度狭窄或闭塞)三组,统计各组左右两侧大脑中动脉供血区的各参数值,运用非参数秩和检验法比较两侧值的组间差异及组内差异。结果:进入统计分析的患者共39例,其中A组11例,B组13例,C组15例。经统计学检验发现,ADC值、DDC值的左右侧差值及左右侧比值的对数值的各组间比较、C组的组内比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组DDC值的左右侧差值及左右侧比值的对数值的组内比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组ADC值的左右侧差值比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),左右侧比值的对数值的比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。α值的上述差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:运用多b值DWI技术定量分析大脑前循环狭窄时,单指数模型的ADC值和拉伸指数模型的DDC值在无动脉狭窄和狭窄者之间的差异均有明显体现,而DDC值对不同程度狭窄者之间的差异更敏感。 Objective:To compare the differences of parameters of diffusion weighted imaging(DWI) with both stretched-exponential and mono-exponential model between left and right cerebral hemisphere in patients with unilateral arteriostenosis.Methods:Patients who underwent head-neck CTA scan in our hospital and had no MR imaging contraindication and signed the informed consent were included in our study.The b-values were 0,5,10,20,50,100,200,400,600,1000,1500,2000,3000s/mm2,and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADCs) values,distributed diffusion coefficients(DDCs) and α values were calculated through workstation.According to the stenotic degrees of internal carotid artery system,patients were divided in three groups:group A with no stenosis,group B with mild and moderate stenosis,and group C with severe stenosis or complete occlusion.We calculated every parameters of both cerebral side in every groups,and compared the differences among groups and within groups by using Kruskal-Wallis statistic for Wilcoxon rank sum test.Results:39 cases were enrolled in our study.The numbers of group A,B and C were 11,13 and 15,respectively.By statistic analysis,the differences between left and right and Ln(left/right) of ADCs and DDCs among three groups and within group C had statistical significance(P0.05).In group B,the differences between left and right and Ln(left/right) of DDCs had statistical significance(P0.05);the differences between left and right of ADCs had no statistical significance(P0.05),the Ln(left/right) of ADCs had statistical significance(P0.05).Besides,the above mentioned differences of α values were not significant(P0.05).Conclusion:When applying multi-b values in DWI to evaluate the cerebral anterior circulation arteriostenosis quantitatively,ADC of mono-exponential model and DDC of stretched-exponential model reflected significant differences between arteriostenosis and normal,but DDC was more sensitive among various stenotic degrees.
出处 《放射学实践》 2012年第1期11-16,共6页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 动脉狭窄 扩散加权成像 磁共振成像 Arteriostenosis Diffusion weighted imaging Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Le Bihan D,Turner R,Douek P,et al.Diffusion MR imaging:clinical applications[J].AJR,1992,159(3):159-599.
  • 2Kwee TC,Galban CJ,Tsien C,et al.Comparison of apparent diffu sion coefficients and distributed diffusion coefficients in high-grade gliomas[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2010,31(3):531-537.
  • 3Le Bihan D,Breton E,Lallemand D,et al.Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging[J].Radiology,1988,168(2):497-505.
  • 4Bennett KM,Schmainda KM,Bennett RT,et al.Characterization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched-exponential model[J].Magn Reson Med,2003,50(4):727-734.
  • 5Pan J,Konstas AA,Bateman B,et al.Reperfusion injury following cerebral ischemia:pathophysiology,MR imaging and potential therapies[J].Neuroradiology,2007,49(2):93-102.
  • 6Mulkern RV,Vajapeyam S,Robertson RL,et al.Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficient parametrization in adult vs newborn brain[J].Magn Reson Imaging,2001,19(5):659-668.
  • 7Luciani A,Vignaud A,Cavet M,et al.Liver cirrhosis:intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging-pilot study[J].Radiology,2008,249(3):891-899.

同被引文献92

  • 1焦力群,凌锋,卢洁,张鸿祺,缪中荣,吉讯明,宋庆斌,张洋.利用灌注MRI技术评价颈内动脉狭窄或闭塞的血流动力学状态[J].临床放射学杂志,2004,23(10):835-838. 被引量:8
  • 2吕新辉,毕振强,钱跃升.中国艾滋孤儿现状及应对策略[J].中国公共卫生,2006,22(7):872-873. 被引量:19
  • 3Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging[J]. Ra- diology, 1988, 168(2):497-505.
  • 4Pan J, Konstas A A, Bateman B, et al. Reperfusion injury fol- lowing cerebral ischemia: pathophysiology, MR imaging, and po- tential therapies[J]. Neuroradiology, 2007, 49(2) : 93- 102.
  • 5Mulkern R V, Vajapeyam S, Robertson R L, et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficient parametrization in adult vs newborn brain[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2001,19(5) :659-668.
  • 6Luciani A, Vignaud A, Gavet M, et al. Liver cirrhosis: intravox- el incoherent motion MR imaging-pilot study[J]. Radiology, 2008, 249(3) :891-899.
  • 7Mulkern R V, Barnes A S, Haker S J, et al. Biexponential char- acterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2006, 24(5): 563-568.
  • 8Steier R, Aradi M,Pdl J, et al. A biexponential DWI study in rat brain intracellular oedema[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011, 81(8) : 1758- 1765.
  • 9Maier S E, Mulkern R V. Biexponential analysis of diffusion-re- lated signal decay in normal human cortical and deep gray matter [J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2008 ,26(7) : 897-904.
  • 10Bemett K M, Schmainda K M, Bennett R T, et al. Character- ization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched-exponential model[J]. Magnet Reson Med,2003, 50(4):727-734.

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部