期刊文献+

淋巴结分类情况下不同类型三阴性乳腺癌的预后分析 被引量:1

Prognostic Analysis for Different Types of Three Negative Breast Cancer with Lymph Node Classification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨三阴性乳腺癌及基底细胞样乳腺癌与患者临床病理特征及预后的相关性。方法应用免疫组织化学(EnVision二步法)检测69例三阴性乳腺癌患者原发灶石蜡切片中CK5/6、CK14、CK17的表达情况,将其分成基底细胞样型(BP)和非基底细胞样型(NBP)两组;再根据患者淋巴结转移情况分成淋巴结阴性组和淋巴结阳性组,并分别分析基底标志物的表达及淋巴结转移情况与患者临床病理特征及预后的相关性。结果 40例患者(58.0%)是基底细胞样型。淋巴结阴性组中,BP患者肿瘤直径较大、EGFR阳性表达率较高、脉管癌栓阳性率较高、组织学分级与核分级较高,差异有统计学意义。且淋巴结阴性的BP患者较NBP患者远处转移及复发率较高,预后差。结论检测三阴性乳腺癌基底标记物的表达情况,并将其具体分型,对于临床制定三阴性乳腺癌患者个体化治疗方案及预后的判断是必要的。 Objective To investigate three negative breast cancer and basal-like breast cancer patients with clinical pathologic characteristics and prognosis of relevancy. Methods All of the 69 patients were proved to be triple-negative by immunohistochemical screening or FISH testing. Immunohtstochemteal staining was performed for the CK5/6, CK14, and CK17 basal markers in 69 patients for the purpose of classifying as basal or non-basal phenotype, and classify the TNBC on the basis of being positive or negative for lymph node metastasis, then the clinicopathological features and outcome of the patients was analyzed. Re- sults Forty patients (58. ()~) were the BLBC. In the node-negative group,compared with the NBP,the BP were significantly larger in tumor size, and were higher in incidence of EGFR-positive, incidence of vascular invasion,grade of histology and nuclear,and showed a higher incidence of recurrence and distant metastasis. Conclusion It is required to test for basal marker expression and Classify TNBC, this will aid in deciding the therapeutic strategy and prognosis for triple-negative breast cancer.
出处 《肿瘤防治研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期51-53,共3页 Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
关键词 三阴性乳腺癌 基底细胞样型乳腺癌 预后 Triple-negative breast cancer Basal-like breast cancer Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Cleator S, HellerW, Coombers RC. Triple-negative breast cancer ; therapeutic options[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2007,8 (3) : 235-244.
  • 2Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, et al. Breast cancer mo lecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy[J]. Clin Cancer Res,2005,11 (16) :5678 5685.
  • 3Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO. Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review[J].J Clin Oncol, 2008,26(15) : 2568-2581. R.
  • 4akha EA, EI-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple negative breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 2006, 109(1): 25-32.
  • 5Rakha EA, EI Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Breast carcinoma with basal differentiation:a proposal for pathology definition based on basal cytokeratin expression [J]. Histopathol, 2007,50 (4) : 434-438.
  • 6Seal MD,Chia SK. What Is the Difference Between Triple- N egative and Basal Breast Cancers[J]. Cancer J, 2010,16 ( 1 ) .. 12-16.
  • 7Nielsen TO, Hsu FD,Jensen K, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of in- vasive breast carcinoma[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10 (16) : 5367-5374.
  • 8Liu ZB, Liu GY, Yang WT, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer types exhibit a distinct poor clinical characteristic in lymph node-negative Chinese patients[J].Oncol Rep, 2008,20 (4) : 987-994.
  • 9Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M, et al. Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early stage breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24 (36) : 5652 5657.
  • 10罗湘,史艳侠,李志铭,张东生,苏争艳,姜文奇.三阴乳腺癌的临床病理特征和预后分析[J].中国癌症杂志,2009,19(7):517-522. 被引量:20

二级参考文献19

  • 1Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [ J ] . JAMA, 2006, 295(21): 2492-2502.
  • 2Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard K J, et M. Triple negative breast cancer: features and patterns of recurrence [ J ] . Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13(15): 4429-4434.
  • 3Rakha EA, EI-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple negative breast cancer [ J].Cancer, 2007, 109(1): 25-32.
  • 4Umemura S, Takekoshi S, Suzuki Y, et al. Estrogen receptornegative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer tissue have the highest Ki-67 labeling index and EGFR expression: gene amplification does not contribute to EGFR expression [ J ] . Oncol Rep, 2005,14(2): 337-343.
  • 5Perez EA, Roche PC, Jenkins RB, et al. Her-2 testing in patients with breast cancer: poor correlation between weak positivity by immunohistochemistry and gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization [J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2002, 77(2): 148-154.
  • 6Carlson RW, Moench S J, Hammond ME, et al. fler-2 testing in breast cancer: NCCN Task Force reporl and recommendations [J]. J Natl Compr Cane Netw, 2006, 4(Suppl 3): 1-22.
  • 7Siziopkou KP, Cobleigh M. The basal subtype of breast carcinomas may represent the 7 group of breast tumors that could benefit from EGFR-targeted therapies [ J ] . Breast, 2007, 16(1): 104-107.
  • 8Livasy CA, Karaea G, Nanda R, et al. Phenotypie evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma [J].Mod Pathol, 2006, 19(2): 264-271.
  • 9Rakha EA, Reis Filho J, Ellis IO. Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review [ J ] . J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(30): 4772-4778.
  • 10Reis-Filho JS, Tutt AN. Triple negative breast cancer: a critical review [ J ] . Histopathology, 2008, 52(1): 108-118.

共引文献19

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部