5Aarseth, E. (2003). Playing research : methodological approaches to game analysis[ EB/OL]. DiGRA 2003 Level Up Conference. Utrecht : University of Utrecht. [ 2008-08-09 ]. http ://www. spilforskning. dk/gameapproaches/GameApproches 2. pdf.
6Aldrich, C. (2004). Simulations and the future of learning:An innovative (and perhaps revolutionary) approach to eleaming [ R]. San Francisco, CA : Pfeiffer. xi, 282.
7Bogos, I. , Mateas, M. , Murray, J. , & Nitsche, M. (2005).Asking what is possible: the georgia tech approach to game research and education [ J ]. The Interactive Digital Media & Arts Association Journal: 59-68.
8Bowman, R. (1982). A pac-man theory of motivation: tacticalimplications for classroom instruction [ J ]. Educational Technology, 22 (9) : 14-17.
9Carbonaro, M. , Cutumisu, M. , McNaughton, M. , Onuczko,C. ,Roy,T,Schaeffer,J. ,& Szafron,D. (2005). Interactive story writing in the classroom: using computer games[ DB/OL]. In DiGRA 2005 Conference. Burnaby, Canada. [ 2008-08-10]. http://www, digra, org/db/ 06276. 35222. pdf.
10Dewey, J. (1933). How we think : a restatement of the relationof reflective thinking to the educative process [ J ]. Boston ; New York [ etc. ] : D. C. Heath and company, x,301.
