期刊文献+

基于快速切换的代理移动IPv6路由优化方案 被引量:3

Fast handover based route optimization approach in proxy mobile IPv6
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对代理移动IPv6移动节点(MN)切换后重建优化路径时延较长问题,提出一种基于快速切换的路由优化方案。新方案通过在MN快速切换过程中由旧移动接入网关提前发起路由优化,实现了优化路径的快速重建。性能分析表明,新域内路由优化方案比局部移动锚点发起的路由优化方案减少了21.7%的路由优化平均费用和45.4%的路由优化状态建立时延;新域间路由优化方案比现有域间切换及路由优化方案减少了72.2%的路由优化状态建立时延。 Concerning the long recovery time to re-establish the optimized path after mobile node's handover, this paper proposed a fast handover based route optimization approach in proxy mobile IPv6. The new approach, which was initiated by previous mobile access gateway in advance in mobile node's fast handover procedure, achieved fast recovery of optimized path. Performance analysis shows that the new intra-domain route optimization method can reduce average route optimization cost by 21.7% and the setup time of route optimization state by 45.4%, compared with the local mobility anchor initiated route optimization protocol. In addition, the new inter-domain route optimization method can decrease the setup time of route optimization state by 72.2% in comparison with the existing inter-domain handover and route optimization approach.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期335-339,共5页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61070217)
关键词 代理移动IPV6 快速切换 路由优化 流体移动模型 Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) fast handover route optimization fluid-flow mobility model
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1GUNDAVELLI S,LEUNG K,DEVARAPALLI V,et al.IETF RFC 5213,Proxy mobile IPv6[S].LETF,2008.
  • 2ABEILLE J,LLEBSCH M,MELIA T.Mobility anchor controlled route optimization for network based mobility management[C]// GLOBECOM '07:IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.Piscataway:IEEE,2007:1802-1807.
  • 3SONG J,KIM H,HAN S.Route optimization in PMIPv6 environment[C]//CIT '09:IEEE Ninth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology.Washington,DC:IEEE Computer Society,2009,2:341-346.
  • 4WONGY-C,WANGT-P,LINY-B.Effects of route optimization on out-of-order packet delivery in mobile IP networks[J].Information Sciences,2005,169(3/4):263-278.
  • 5LEE J-H,LIM H-J,CHUNG T-M.Preventing out-of-sequence packets on the route optimization procedure in proxy mobile IPv6[C]//AINA 2008:22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications.Washington,DC:IEEE Computer Society,2008:950-954.
  • 6CHOI J S,JUNG B G,KIM T.LMA initiated route optimization protocol for improving PMIP handover performance[J].IEEE Communications Letters,2009,13(11):871-873.
  • 7YOKOTA H,CHOWDHURY K,KOODLI R,et al.LETF RFC 5949,Fast handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6[S].LETF,2010.
  • 8任三阳,柴蓉,唐伦,陈前斌.基于PMIPv6的域间切换管理方法及性能分析[J].计算机应用研究,2010,27(3):1118-1121. 被引量:6
  • 9李占波,王利明,王薛苑.基于ROE的轻型PMIPv6路由优化策略[J].计算机工程,2010,36(22):108-110. 被引量:1
  • 10AKYILDIZ I F,WANG W.A dynamic location management scheme for next-generation multitier PCS systems[J].IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication,2002,1(1):178-189.

二级参考文献17

  • 1JOHNSON D, PERKINS C, ARKKO J. RFC 3775, Mobility support in IPv6 [ S]. [ S.l.]: IETF,2004.
  • 2GUNDAVELLI S, LEUNG K, DEVARAPALLI V, et al. RFC 5213, Proxy mobile IPv6[ S]. [S. l. ] :IETF,2008.
  • 3KOODLI G. RFC 4068, Fast handover for mobile IPv6 [ S]. [ S. l. ] : IETF,2005.
  • 4KIVINEN T, TSCHOPFENING H. RFC 4621, Design of the IKEv2 mobility and multihoming (MOBIKE) protocol [ S ]. [ S. 1. ] : IETF, 2006.
  • 5MOSKOWITZ R, NIKANDER P. RFC 4423, Host identity protocol (HIP) architecture [ S ]. [ S. l. ]: IETF,2006.
  • 6KEMPF J. RFC 4830, Problem statement for network-based localized mobility management (NETLMM) [ S]. [ S. l. ] :IETF,2007.
  • 7KOODLI R. RFC 4882, IP address location privacy and mobile IPv6 : problem statement[ S]. [ S. l. ] :IETF,2007.
  • 8IEEE Std 17802.21, IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks media independent handover services[S].2008.
  • 9KONG K, LEE W, HAN Y,et al. Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks:mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6 [ J]. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2008,15(2) :36-45.
  • 10FAITHI H, PRASAD R. Mobility management for VoIP in 3G systems : evaluation of low-latency handoff schemes [ J ]. IEEE Wireless Communications,2005,12(2) : 98-104.

共引文献5

同被引文献19

  • 1Johnson D, Perkins C, Arkko J. IETF RFC3775. Mobility Support in IPv6. June 2004.
  • 2Gundavelli S, Leung K, Devarapalli V, et al. IETF RFC 5213. Proxy Mobile IPv6. 2008.
  • 3Yi MK, Choi JW, Yang YK. A comparative analysis on the signaling load of proxy mobile IPv6 and hierarchical mobile IPv6. ISWPC 2009. New Jersey: IEEE Press, 2009.1-5.
  • 4张仕斌,万武南,张金全.应用密码学.西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,2009.
  • 5X.Pérez-Costa,H.Hartenstein. A Simulation Study on the Per-formance of Mobile IPv6 in a WLAN-Based Cellular Network[J].Computer Networks Journal(CNJ),2002.
  • 6孙宇虹;胡言群.无线局域网终端的移动性研究[D]南京:东南大学,2008.
  • 7Ben McCarthy,Matthew Jakeman,Dr Chris Edwards,Pascal Th-ubert. Protocols to Efficiently Support Nested NEMO (NEMO+)[J].MobiArch,2008.
  • 8刘强;李邵梅;于婧.移动IPv6协议的同时移动问题研究[J]计算机工程,2007(20).
  • 9C Perkins. IP Mobility Support for IPv4[S].RFC3220 IETF,2002.
  • 10S. Gundavelli, etal. RFC5215 Proxy Mobile IPv6 [ S ].2008.

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部