摘要
目的研究母源表达的印记基因p57K1P2和PHLDA2(IPL/TSSC3)蛋白表达对葡萄胎的辅助诊断意义。方法收集北京协和医院刮宫组织存档的石蜡包埋标本,其中病理组织学诊断完全性葡萄胎(completehydatidiformmole,CHM)13例,部分性葡萄胎(partialhydatidiformmole,PHM)16例。全部病例行流式细胞术DNA倍体分析,采用免疫组化二步法检测p57K1P2及PHLDA2在病理组织中表达。结果29例病例DNA倍体分析:二倍体15例,三倍体13例,四倍体1例,诊断为CHM15例,PHM14例,病理诊断的符合率为86.2%。部分性葡萄胎p57K1P2和PHLDA2绒毛滋养细胞层免疫组织化学全部阳性(100%,14/14)。PHLDA2染色阳性位于胞质和胞膜,表达为强阳性。p57K1P2染色阳性位于胞核,表达为强阳性。所有完全型葡萄胎绒毛滋养细胞层p57K1P2和PHLDA2免疫组织化学均阴性(100%,15/15)。结论p57K1P2和PHLDA2可能是鉴别CHM和非CHM的标志物,两者免疫组化学阴性可能是CHM的可靠标志物,但有待扩大样本验证。
Objective To investigate the value of combined use of p57K1P2 and PHLDA2 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry in the difierential diagnosis of placental hydropic diseases.Methods Specimens of 29 cases of mole pregnancy, formerly diagnosed as complete hydatidiform moles(CHM,n=13),and partial hydatidiform moles (PHMn=16), were reviewed by a senior pathologist.p57K1P2 and PHLDA2 immunohistochemical staining and flow cytometry DNA ploidy analysis were performed in all 29 cases.Results Flow cytometry in all 29 molar cases suggested that 14 cases were triploidy or tetraploid (means these cases are PHM) and 15 cases were diploidy (means these cases are CHM).All flow cytometrically confirmed partial moles were both p57K1P2 and PHLDA2 positive.There was strong PHLDA2 staining of the cytoplasm in virtually all cells of the villous cytotrophoblast, while p57K1P2 was localized to the nucleus in a subset of those cells. All flow cytometrically showed that complete moles cases were both p57K1P2 and PHLDA2 negative.Conclusion Immunohistochemistry for p57K1P2 and PHLDA2 may be serves as a practical and reliable diagnostic marker for the diagnosis of complete mole from partial mole.
出处
《中国妇产科临床杂志》
2012年第1期43-45,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology