期刊文献+

利用SNP标记进行北京地区中国荷斯坦牛亲子推断的研究 被引量:10

Parentage Inference with Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers in the Chinese Holstein in Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究旨在利用SNP标记对北京地区中国荷斯坦牛群进行亲子推断,并分析场、母牛出生年月、公牛家系对系谱错误率的影响,以期为指导奶牛育种和生产管理提供依据。共选取了255个最小等位基因频率大于0.45的高多态SNPs标记,利用似然法,采用Cervus3.0软件对北京地区84头荷斯坦公牛和1 927头母牛进行亲子推断研究。结果显示,试验群体平均系谱错误率为20.9%,不同的场、出生年份和月份的母牛的系谱错误率有显著差异(P<0.05),而各公牛家系间系谱错误率差异不显著(P>0.05)。结果说明,错误系谱的发生主要是由于牛场本身记录不完善造成的。在我国亟需建立利用遗传标记监测、校正系谱准确性的制度,采取措施提高系谱的准确性,加快我国荷斯坦牛遗传改良进程。 The aim of this study were to use single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) markers for parentage inference in the Chinese Holstein, to discuss the effects of herd, birth year and birth month of the cow, sire family on the pedigree error rate, and to guide the cattle breeding and management. 255 highly polymorphic SNP markers, with the average minor allele frequency (MAF) over 0.45, were used for parentage inference among 84 Chinese Holstein bulls and 1 927 cows in Beijing. The analysis was carried out by the Cervus3. 0 software adopting likelihood method. The average pedigree error rate was 20.9% in the experimental population. Moreover, the pedigree error rate among different herds, birth year and birth month of the cow were significantly different (P〈O. 05), while there was no significant difference among sires(P〉0. 05)Therefore, the occurrenee of pedigree error was mainly due to the poor management in the dairy herds. It is very neeessary to establish pedigree supervision and eorrection system and take measures to improve the pedigree accuracy, which would speed up the process of dairy genetic improvement in China.
出处 《畜牧兽医学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期44-49,共6页 ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA
基金 “863”重大项目(2008AA101002) 国家奶牛产业技术体系专项资金 “十二五”国家科技支撑计划课题(2011BAD28B02) 国际合作项目(2008DFA31120) 948项目(2010-C14)
关键词 中国荷斯坦牛 似然法 亲子推断 SNP 系谱错误 Chinese Holstein likelihood method parentage inference single nucleotide polymor-phism (SNP) pedigree error
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1BANOS G, WIGGANS G R, POWELL R L. Impact of paternity errors in cow identification on genetic evaluations and international comparisons [J]. J Dairy Sci, 2001, 84: 25232529.
  • 2汪湛,田雨泽,刘和凤.应用血型分析技术对奶牛亲子关系正确率的调查初报[J].中国畜牧兽医,2005,32(3):22-23. 被引量:7
  • 3初芹,张毅,孙东晓,俞英,王雅春,张沅.应用微卫星DNA标记分析荷斯坦母牛系谱可靠性及影响因素[J].畜牧兽医学报,2011,42(2):163-168. 被引量:9
  • 4HEATON M P, HARHAY G P, BENNETT G L, et al. Selection and use of SNP markers for animal identification and paternity analysis in US beef cattle [J]. Mamm Genome, 2002, 13: 272281.
  • 5WERNER F A O, DURSTEWITZ G, HABERMANN F A, et al. Detection and characterization of SNPs useful for identity control and parentage testing in major European dairy breeds [J]. Anim Genet, 2004, 35: 4449.
  • 6FISHER P J, MALTHUS B, WALKER M C, et al. The number of single nucleotide polymorphisms and onfarm data required for wholeherd parentage testing in dairy cattle herds [J]. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92: 369374.
  • 7MARSHALL T C, SLATE J, KRUUK L E B, et al. Statistical confidence for likelihoodbased paternity inference in natural populations [J]. Mol Ecol, 1998, 7: 639655.
  • 8KALINOWSKI S T, TAPER M L, MARSHALL T C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment[J]. Mol Ecol, 2007, 16: 10991106.
  • 9ANDERSON E C, GARZA J C. The power of singlenucleotide polymorphisms for largescale parentage inference [J]. Genetics,2006,172: 25672582.
  • 10周 磊. 利用微卫星和SNP标记进行奶牛亲子鉴定的模拟研究 [M]. 北京:中国农业大学,2010.

二级参考文献12

  • 1ANDERSON E C, GARZA J C. The power of sin gle-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parent age inference [J]. Genetics, 2006, 172 (4): 2567 2582.
  • 2RAYMOND M, ROUSSET F. GENEPOP (version 1.2) : population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism[J]. J Heredity, 1996, 86: 248-249.
  • 3SANDERS K, BENNEWITZ J, KALM E. Wrong and missing sire information affects genetic gain in the Angeln dairy cattle population [J]. J Dairy Sci, 2006, 89(1): 315-321.
  • 4田菲.中国荷斯坦牛微卫星亲子鉴定体系的建立[D].北京:中国农业大学,2007.
  • 5HEARNE C M, GHOSH S, TODD J A. Microsatellites for linkage analysis of genetic traits [J]. Trends Genet, 1992, 8(8): 288-294.
  • 6HOFFMAN J I, AMOS W. Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion [J]. Mol Ecol, 2005, 14: 599-612.
  • 7GELDERMANN H, PIPER U, WEBER W E. Effect of misidentification on the estimation of breeding value and heritability in cattle [J]. J Anita Sci 1986, 63: 1759-1768.
  • 8VISSCHER P M, WOOLLIAMS J A, SMITH D, et al. Estimation of pedigree errors in the UK dairy population using microsatellite markers and the impact on selection [J]. J Dairy Sci, 2002, 85(9): 2368-2375.
  • 9WELLER J I, FELDMESSER E, GOLIK M, et al. Factors affecting incorrect paternity assignment in the Israeli Holstein population [J]. J Dairy Sci, 2004, 87(8) : 2627-2640.
  • 10陈慧勇.利用中国荷斯坦牛定位BTA6上影响产奶性状的QTLs[D].北京:中国农业大学,2004.

共引文献12

同被引文献131

引证文献10

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部