期刊文献+

正电子发射体层成像/计算机断层扫描在口腔颌面部肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移中的诊断价值 被引量:7

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting cervical nodule metastases of oral and ma-xillofacial cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价正电子发射体层成像/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)在口腔颌面部肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移诊断中的价值。方法检索中国生物医学文献数据库、Medline(OVID)和EMBASE(检索时间为2010年12月13日),并采用手工检索19种中文口腔医学期刊的方法收集PET/CT对口腔颌面部肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移的诊断性试验。由2名研究者分别进行文献纳入及文献质量评价,应用MetaDisc 1.4进行Meta分析。结果共9篇文献符合纳入标准。Meta分析结果显示PET/CT对口腔颌面部肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移(以淋巴结分区为单位)的合并敏感度、合并特异度分别为0.84、0.93;诊断比值比为47.89;工作曲线下面积为0.973 8。结论 PET/CT对口腔颌面部肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移的诊断准确性很高,可以作为诊断口腔颌面部肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移的选择,但在选择时应该充分考虑其诊断费用和安全性。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for detecting cervical nodule metastases of oral and maxillofacial cancer. Methods Diagnostic test accuracy studies assessing the accuracy of PET/CT in diagnosis of cervical metastases of oral and maxillofacial cancer were retrieved from the databases of CBM, Medline (OVID) and EMBASE (searched on Dec. 13th, 2010) and manual searching of 19 dental journals in Chinese. Two researchers were employed in the articles investigation independently and evaluated the quality with quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS). Meta-analysis was done using MetaDisc 1.4. Results Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and demonstrated high methodological quality. The results of Meta-analysis showed that, when nodal level was used as unit, PET/CT had good diagnostic value in detecting the cervical nodule metastases of oral and maxillofacial cancer. Under such a condition, the pooled sensitivity was 0.84, pooled specificity 0.93, pooled diagnostic odds ratio 47.89 and area under the curve 0.973 8. Conclusion The accuracy of PET/CT for detecting cervical nodule metastases of oral and maxillofacial cancer is relatively high and it could be used as a good diagnostic tool. And special attention should be payed to its diagnostic expense and safety when considering PET/CT.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期36-39,44,共5页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 2010年全国"大学生创新性实验计划"基金资助项目(101061001)
关键词 口腔肿瘤 正电子发射体层成像/计算机断层扫描 肿瘤转移 敏感度与特异度 oral cancer positron emission tomography/computed tomography neoplasm metastasis sensitivity and specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et aL Cancer statistics, 2010[J]. CA Can- cer J Clin, 2010, 60(5):277-300.
  • 2邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学嗍.6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:230-289.
  • 3de Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Hofman PA, et al. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis com- paring US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2007, 64 (2) : 266-272.
  • 4Hillman BJ, Goldsmith JC. The uncritical use of high-tech medical imaging[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(1):4-6.
  • 5Townsend DW, Carney JP, Yap JT, et al. PET/CT today and tomo- rrow[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45(Suppl 1):4S-14S.
  • 6Nahmias C, Carlson ER, Duncan LD, et al. Positron emission to mography/computerized tomography(PET/CT) scanning for preope- rative staging of patients with oral/head and neck cancer[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65 (12) : 2524-2535.
  • 7Schoder H, Carlson DL, Kraus DH, et al. lSF-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged Noby clinical examination and CT/MRI[J]. J Nucl Med, 2006, 47 (5): 755-762.
  • 8王欣璐,王全师,吴湖炳,王明芳,王巧愚,李洪生,张雪林.口腔鳞癌的^(18)F-FDG PET/CT的影像学表现以及与CT平扫的比较研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(8):995-998. 被引量:6
  • 9Seitz O, Chambron-Pinho N, Middendorp M, et al. lSF-Fluoro- deoxyglucose-PET/CT to evaluate tmnor, nodal disease, and gross tumor volume of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer: Compari- son with MR imaging and validation with surgical specimen[J]. Neuroradiology, 2009, 51 (10) :677-686.
  • 10Pentenero M, Cistaro A, Bmsa M, et al. Accuracy of 18F-FDG- PET/CT for staging of oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Head Neck, 2008, 30(11) : 1488-1496.

二级参考文献24

  • 1Cermik TF Mavi A Acikgoz G.FDG PET在检测原发性和复发性唾液腺恶性肿瘤中的价值[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2007,5(3):224-224. 被引量:1
  • 2Antoch G,Vogt FM,Freudenberg LS,et al.Whole-body dual -modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology[J].JAMA,2003,290(24):3199-3206.
  • 3Sugimura K,Kuroda S,Furukawa T.Tongue cancer treated with irradiation:assessment with MRI[J].Clin Radiol,1992,46 (4):243-245.
  • 4Sprio RH.Predictive value of tumor thickness floor of mouth stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ cancers to regional metastasis[J].Am J Surg,1986,152 (4):351 -356.
  • 5Adams S,Baum RP,Stuckensen T,et al.Prospective comparison of 18F -FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities(CT,MRI,US)in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer[J].Eur J Nucl Med,1998,25(9):1255-1260.
  • 6Glasziou P,Irwig L,Bain C,et al.Systematic reviews in health care:A practical guide.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press 2001.
  • 7Decks J.Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.In:Systematic Reviews in Health Care:Metaanalysis in context Edited by:Egger M,Davey Smith G,Altman D.London:BMJ Publishing Group;2001.Second edition.
  • 8Whiting P,Rutjes A,Dinnes J,et al.A systematic review of existing quality assessment tools used to assess the quality of diagnostic research submitted.
  • 9Streiner DL,Norman GR.Health measurement scales:a practical guide to their development and use.Oxford:Oxford University Press 1995.
  • 10Jadad AR,Moore A,Carroll D,et al.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials,1996,17:1-12.

共引文献73

同被引文献51

  • 1李益民,李平,李芳兰,李磊,王欣.18F-FDG PET/CT显像在诊断头颈部肿瘤残留复发灶中的临床价值[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2009,22(1):39-41. 被引量:3
  • 2白爱国,何薇,滑炎卿.肺癌分子影像学成像进展[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(21):6851-6853. 被引量:2
  • 3中华口腔医学会口腔颌面外科专业委员会肿瘤学组.口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤颈淋巴结转移的外科诊治指南[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2005,3(1):3-9. 被引量:27
  • 4S('ully C, Bagan J. Oral squamotts cell (arcinoma: overview of current undcrshmding o[" aetiopathogenesis and clinical implicationslJ]. Oral Dis, 2009, 15(6): 388-399.
  • 5Alvi A, Johnson JT. I'xtracapsular spread in the .linieally negatiw" nek (NO): implit'ations mitt outi'onleiJ].(1)tolaryngol Head Ne'k Surg, 1996, 114(1): 65-70.
  • 6Ambroseh P, Kron M. Fischer (,. et al. Mietmetastases m eareinc,ma of the upper aercdigestive tract: detection, risk of metastasizing, and prognostic value of depth of invasion [J]. Head Neck. 1995.17(6): 473-479.
  • 7Robbins KT, Medina JE, Wolfe GT,el al. Standardizing neck dissection terminology. Official repo't [" the Aca(lem',,'s Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncohg" [JI. Arch OtolaTngol Head Neck Surg, 1991, I 17(6): 601-605.
  • 8Koshy M, Paulino AC, Howell R. et aI. F-18 FI)C PET-(iT fusion in ra(liotherapy trealment t)[anning fir hea(] and ne('k (.ancerIJI.Head Neck, :2005,27(5): 494-502.
  • 9Branstetter BF 4th, Bltxlgett TM. Zimmer I,A, l a]. Head mid nt'k malignancy: is I"ET/CT more accmale thml PET or CT done'[J].Radiology,2005.235(2): 580-586.
  • 10Seitz O, Chambrnn-Pinho N, Middcndnrp M. et al. 18F- FluonMenxygluose-PET/CT to evaluate tumor, nodal disease, and gnss tumor vtlumt' hi" orophaTngeal anti oral cavity cantr: comparison with MR imaging and validation with surgical specimen[ J ]. Neuroradiology,2009, 51 (1 0): 677-686.

引证文献7

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部