期刊文献+

Herbst矫治器治疗年轻成人安氏Ⅱ类2分类错的研究 被引量:11

Treatment of Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion with Herbst appliance in young adults
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价Herbst矫治器治疗年轻成人安氏Ⅱ类2分类错的疗效。方法对12名安氏Ⅱ类2分类错的年轻成人患者,采用铸造夹板式Herbst矫治器及固定矫治器矫治,通过X线头影测量比较矫治前后有关指标的变化并进行统计分析。结果矫治后SNA、Co-Go、Go-Po变化无统计学意义,SNB增加,ANB减小,上下前牙唇倾,上磨牙后移,下磨牙升高并前移,下颌平面、平面顺时针旋转。患者矫治后前牙达到浅覆、浅覆盖关系,磨牙达到中性关系。结论年轻成人安氏Ⅱ类2分类错可通过铸造夹板式Herbst矫治器结合固定矫治器获得满意的效果。 Objective To evaluate the effects of angle Class II division 2 malocclusion treated with Herbst appliance in young adults. Methods Cast splint Herbst appliance and multi-bracket appliance were used to treat 12 patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion aged from 16 to 25 years old. The lateral cephalograms were measured with Winceph 8.0 software and statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS 13.0 software. Results The changes in SNA, CoGo, Go-Po after treatment had no statistical significance (P〉0.05). The SNB increased and ANB decreased after treatment. Upper and lower incisors labially inclined and inter-incisor angle increased. Upper posterior teeth had distal movement, lower posterior teeth had mesial movement and extrusion. Mandibular plane angle and occlusal plane angle had clockwise rotation. The overbite decreased significantly, and the molar relationship changed from Class II to Class I in all patients. Conclusion Herbst appliance combined with multi-bracket appliance can be used effectively for correcting Class II division 2 malocclusion in young adults.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期49-53,共5页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 江西省教育厅科技计划基金资助项目(GJJ08087)
关键词 安氏Ⅱ类2分类 HERBST矫治器 年轻成人 头影测量分析 Class II division 2 Herbst appliance: young adults cephalometric analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in ado- lescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radio- graphic investigation[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999, 115 (6) : 607-618.
  • 2Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R. Treatment of skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion in adults: Stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance[J]. World J Orthod, 2008, 9(3):233- 243.
  • 3Brezniak N, Arad A, Heller M, et al. Pathognomonic cephalome- trie characteristics of Angle Class Ⅱ Division 2 malocclusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 2002, 72 (3) : 251-257.
  • 4Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance[J]. Angle Orthod, 1999, 69 (3) : 239-246.
  • 5Ruf S, Pancherz H. When is the ideal period for Herbst therapyearly or late[J]. Semin Orthod, 2003, 9(1):47-56.
  • 6Houston WJ. Incisor edge--centroid relationships and overbite depth [J]. Eur J Orthod, 1989, 11 (2) : 139-143.
  • 7Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. The headgear effect of the Herb- st appliance: A cephalometric long-term study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1993, 103 (6) :510-520.
  • 8Ruf S, Pancherz H. The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: A cephalometric roentgenographic stu- dy[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 110(2):225-229.
  • 9Eberhard H, Hirschfelder U. Treatment of Class Ⅱ, Division 2 in the late growth period[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 1998, 59 (6):352-361.

同被引文献77

引证文献11

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部