期刊文献+

基于可靠度理论的预应力钢结构关键构件的评判方法 被引量:3

Probability theory-based evaluation method of key component for prestressed steel structure
原文传递
导出
摘要 为确定影响预应力钢结构体系可靠度的关键构件,从概率分析的角度出发,编制基于蒙特卡罗法的APDL程序,计算得到各个参数的灵敏度;通过分析各构件刚度同等程度的减小所引起的结构体系可靠度的降低,得到各构件的可靠性影响系数;然后由线性加权方法得到构件的权系数方程,从而建立起一种评判影响结构体系可靠度关键构件的计算模型,最后利用某弦支梁工程实例说明了该方法的应用.分析表明,所建议的方法能够准确体现构件权系数的含义,反映出各个构件对结构整体可靠性的影响程度,从而较好评判出结构的关键构件. Based on the probability theory and using the Monte Carlo method, a program is written by APDL language to evaluate key component for the prestressed steel structure. By which, the sensitivities of the correlated variables are calculated. The reliability influence coefficients of structural components are given through computing the decrease of structure system reliability caused by the component stiffness decrease. Then the weight coefficient equation is deduced by linear weighted method. A computational model of key components is thus determined. A practical example of beam string structure is given for the purpose of illustrating the strategy. The result shows that this method reflects the true physical meaning of the structure component weight coefficient and the influential degree of components on the whole structure system reliability. So the key component can be well estimated.
出处 《空间结构》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期28-32,共5页 Spatial Structures
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50778122) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-06-228)
关键词 预应力钢结构 体系可靠度 灵敏度 构件权系数 关键构件 prestressed steel structure system reliability sensitivity weight coefficient key component
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1LU Z, WOODMAN N J, BLOCKLEY D I. A theory of structural vulnerability [J]. The Structural Engineer ing, 1999, 77 (18): 17-24.
  • 2PINTO J T, BLOCKLEY D I, WOODMAN N J. The risk of vulnerable failure [J]. Structural Safety, 2002, 24(2) : 107-122.
  • 3AGARWAL J, BLOCKLEY D I, WOODMAN N J. Vulnerability of structural systems [ J ]. Structural Safety, 2003, 25 (3): 263 -286.
  • 4柳承茂,刘西拉.基于刚度的构件重要性评估及其与冗余度的关系[J].上海交通大学学报,2005,39(5):746-750. 被引量:99
  • 5LIND N C. A measure of vulnerability and damage to le rance[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1995, 48 (1): 1-6.
  • 6CHENG Jin, LI Q S. Application of the response sur-face methods to solve inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions E J2. Computational Mechan- ics, 2009, 43(4): 451-459.
  • 7NGUYEN X S, SELLIER A, DUPRAT F, et al. Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regres- sion technique [J].Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 24(2): 135 -143.
  • 8CHEN Guo liang, ZHOU Xin-quan. Assessment model for system safety based on the artificial neural network and genetic algorithm [A]. Process in Safety Science and Technology EC2, 2002, B(3): 951-956.
  • 9PANDEY P C, BARAIS S V. Structural sensitivity as a measure of redundancy [J]. Journal of Structural Engi neering, 1997, 123(3): 360-364.
  • 10GB500682001.建筑结构可靠度设计统一标准[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.

二级参考文献12

  • 1周濂.双子大厦坍塌后的反思[J].Newton-科学世界,2001(10):62-67. 被引量:3
  • 2GB50068-2001.建筑结构可靠度设计统一标准[S].[S].,..
  • 3GB50017-2003.钢结构设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 4JGJ61-2003.网壳结构技术规程[S].[S].,..
  • 5Theodore V Garambos.Guide to stability design criteria for metal structures[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,Inc.,1998.
  • 6Fukumoto Y.Structural stability design:steel and composite structures[M].Amsterdam:Pergamon Press,1997.
  • 7胡学仁,秦小龙,李丽莲等.穹顶网壳的稳定试验研究[A].第四届空间结构学术交流会论文集[C].成都,1988:465-470.
  • 8Yu Fang,Zhang Qi-Lin.Stability analysis of steel space stiuctures with system parametric uncertainties[J].Communication in Numerical Methods in Engineering,2000,16(4):267-273.
  • 9吴剑同.网壳结构稳定性的可靠性研究[D].同济大学,2001.
  • 10Haldar A,Mahadevan S.Reliability assessment using stochastic finite analysis[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,Inc.,2000.

共引文献111

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部