期刊文献+

强直性脊柱炎疾病活动度评分-D评估依那西普治疗强直性脊柱炎疾病活动度的价值探讨 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨新型指数强直性脊柱炎(AS)疾病活动度评分.D(ASDAS.19)评估短期依那西普治疗AS疾病活动度的价值。方法纳入45例活动性AS患者[巴斯AS疾病活动度指数(BASDAI)≥4分],所有患者予依那西普50mg/周,分1—2次皮下注射,疗程为12周。病情主要评估指标包括ASDAS.D、BASDAI、巴斯AS功能指数(BASFI)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和C反应蛋白(CRP)。评估时间点包括基线及治疗后第4、8、12周。结果治疗后第12周时BASDAI50%改善和BASDAI70%改善的达标率分别为100.0%(45/45)和84.4%(38/45),ASDAS.D、ESR、CRP、BASDAI和BASFI与基线时比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);基线时ASDAS—D与BASDAI、BASFI、ESR和CRP均呈正相关(r=O.61~0.81,P〈0.05),治疗后第12周时ASDAS—D改善幅度(AASDAS-D)也与上述参数改善幅度呈正相关(r=0.66—0.79,P〈0.05);按治疗后第12周时AASDAS.D分组,AASDAS-D≥3分组基线CRP、CRP改善幅度(ACRe)和CRP改善百分比(ACRP%)与AASDAS.D(3分组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);按治疗后第12周时BASDAI70%改善达标与否分组,BASDAI70%改善达标组基线CRP、ACRP和ACRP%与BASDAI70%改善未达标组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);而AASDAS.D≥3分组的基线ASDAS.D显著高于△ASDAS.D〈3分组(P〈0.05)。结论ASDAS.D评估AS疾病活动度与BASDAI、BASFI、ESR和CRP有较好的相关性,且ASDAS.D对临床病情的分辨力优于BASDAI。
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2011年第36期41-43,共3页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献49

  • 1赵福涛,管剑龙,韩星海.甲氨蝶呤治疗强直性脊柱炎髋关节病变的临床研究[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2007,11(4):213-216. 被引量:11
  • 2Zink A, Braun J, Listing J, et al. Disability and handicap in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: results from the German rheumatological database. J Rheumatol, 2000, 27: 613- 622.
  • 3Shealy DJ, Wooley PH, Emmell E, et al. Anti-TNF-α antibody allows healing of joint damage in polyarthritic transgenic mice. Arthritis Res, 2002, 4(5): R7.
  • 4Feldmann M, Brennan FM, Maini RN. The role of cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rev Im munol, 1996, 14: 396-440.
  • 5Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, et al. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. J Rheumatol, 1994, 21: 2286-2291.
  • 6Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, et al. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. J Rheumatol, 1994, 21: 2281-2285.
  • 7Mander M, Simpson JM, McLellan A, et al. Studies with an enthesis index as a method of clinical assessment in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis, 1987, 46: 197-202.
  • 8Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, et al. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS): the Bath AS metrology index. J Rheumatol, 1994, 21: 1694-1698.
  • 9Anderson J J, Baron G, Van der Heijde D, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis assessment group preliminary definition of short-term improvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum, 2001, 44: 1876-1886.
  • 10Bran& J, Khariouzov A, Listing J, et al. Six-month results of a double blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum,2003, 48: 1667-1675.

共引文献85

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部