摘要
杨树岭案是最高人民法院发布的关于保险合同格式条款解释的最重要的指导性案例。通过依据2009年修正《保险法》对该案的重新诠释,保险合同格式条款的解释应当首先使用合同本身的解释条款,但是解释条款是否有效应依据具体情况。一旦解释条款无效,应当通过合同所使用的词句、合同的有关条款、合同的目的及商业习惯确定通常解释。如果有两种以上的合理解释,才能适用不利解释。
Yang Shuling case is the most important guiding case of standard terms of insurance contract by the Supreme Court issued.According to re-interpretation of the case by the Insurance Law amend in 2009,explanation on standard terms of insurance contract should use explanation terms of the contract itself at first,but it should analysis validity of explanation terms in the specific circumstances.Once explanation terms are invalid,it should determine common explanation by words used by the contract,the relevant provisions of the contract,the contract purpose and business practices.There is two or more reasonable explanation,it should apply unfavorable explanation.
出处
《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》
2011年第4期28-33,共6页
Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University
基金
辽宁省哲学社会科学规划基金项目"全球金融危机下中国金融法治的变革与完善"(项目编号:L08DFX030)
辽宁省高校创新团队项目"金融市场秩序法律保障研究"(项目编号:2007T060)
关键词
保险合同
格式条款
解释条款
通常解释
不利解释
insurance contract
standard terms
explanation terms
common explanation
unfavorable explanation