摘要
本文从蒯因的述谓观出发,回顾西方近、现代哲学对命题或语句同一性述谓结构的关注,以此为基础分析中国语言哲学对辞的述谓结构的考察。研究发现,对命题或语句同一性述谓结构的研究是西方哲学传统的、基础性的课题,对辞的异质性述谓结构的考察则构成中国哲学的传统课题。上述差异的结果是,中西语言哲学分别从不同的视角介入语言分析,从而形成自己的研究路径和传统。
Starting with Quine' s theory of predication, this paper reviews the epistemological concerns with the predicative structures of propositions or sentences in modern philosophy as realized in the philosophy of Hobbes, Leibniz and Frege. On this basis, it ana- lyzes the predication of ci as found in the philosophical discourse of Book of Changes, Mozi and Xunzi. The research finds that, whereas the identity of propositional predication is fundamental to Western philosophy, Chinese philosophy tends to accord its at- tention to the heterogeneous predication of ci. This difference, the paper concludes, results in different approaches to language as adopted by Chinese and Western philosophy of language.
出处
《外语学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期15-20,共6页
Foreign Language Research
基金
广东外语外贸大学引进人才科研启动项目"汉语述谓结构的哲学研究"(X340915)的阶段性成果
外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心的资助
关键词
述谓
语句/命题
辞
同一性
异质性
predication
sentence/proposition
ci
identity
heterogeneity