冗思反应量表中文版在抑郁障碍患者中的运用结果分析

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of rumination response scale in depressed patients

目的评价冗思反应量表中文版（RRS—C）在抑郁障碍患者中的信、效度。方法212例抑郁障碍患者完成了RRS—C和流调中心抑郁量表（CEs—D），分析RRS—C的Cronbach’sa系数、条目间平均相关系数、总分和各因子的相关系数，并采用验证性因子分析考察其三因子结构。结果RRS—C总量表的Cronbach’S α系数为0．88，三因子的Cronbach’Sa系数在0．67～O．84；总量表的条目间平均相关系数为0．26，量表总分和各因子间的相关系数在0．71～0．94，各因子条目间平均相关系数在0．29～0．32；验证性因子分析指标（CFI=0．913；GFI=0．905；χ2／v〈2；RSMEA-0．072）均符合测量学要求。结论RRS—C在抑郁障碍患者中有良好的信、效度，可应用于我国抑郁障碍患者冗思特征的测评。

Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Rumina- tion Response Scale（RRS--C） in Depressed patients. Methods A sample of 212 depressed patients was tested. The RRS--C＇s coefficient of Cronbaeh＇s a, mean inter--item correlation coefficient and score-- factor correlation coefficient were examined. Using confirmatory factor analysis,the three--factor Model was tested. Results The Cronbaeh＇s a coefficient of the RRS--C was 0.88. The Cronbaeh＇s a coefficients of 3 factors were among 0.67~0.84. The mean inter--item correlation coefficient of the RRS--C was 0.26. The intra--class correlation coefficients of RRS--C＇s three factors ranged from 0.71~0.94. The intra--class correlation coefficients of the 3 factors ranged from 0.29~0.32. The CFI= 0. 913, GFI= 0. 905, X2 /v^2, RSMEA= 0. 072, and all of them met the criteria standards for adequacy of fit. Conclusions The Chinese Version of Rumination Response Scale was of good reliability and validity in depression patients, which serves as an excellent measuring tool for assessing rumination in Chinese depression patients.