期刊文献+

教育学者与科学家的科学探究观比较

Comparation of educators and scientists' views of inquiry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学探究一方面指科学家们用以研究自然界并基于此种研究获得的证据提出种种解释的多种不同途径;另一方面也指学生们用以获取知识、领悟科学的思想观念、领悟科学家们研究自然界所用的方法而进行的各种活动.教育学者试图通过科学家的科学探究来培养学生的能力,但是之间的观点并不完全一致,本文主要分析和比较了教育学者和科学家的科学探究观,并对其进行了教学实践等方面的反思. Inquiry means different ways to obtain the evidence based on the research of naure,and it also means students' conception of obtaining the knowledge and understaning science and scientists' methods of activities on the natural research.Educaors want to use scientists' inquiry to train students' ability,but there are some differences between them.This paper analyzed and compared educators and scientists' views of inquiry,and refleted its practice.
出处 《首都师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 2011年第6期27-31,共5页 Journal of Capital Normal University:Natural Science Edition
基金 2011年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"中小学生科学探究能力评价的理论与实践研究"和教育部基础教育课程教材发展中心承担的科技部创新方法工作专项"中小学科学探究学习与创新人才培养实验研究"(2009IM010300)子课题"基础理论研究"的阶段性成果
关键词 科学探究观 探究教学 科学探究 科学认识论 views of inquiry inquiry teaching scientific inquiry scientific epistemology
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Mccauley J, Van Thiel DH, Starzl TE, et al. Acute and chronic renal failure in liver transplantation. Nephron,1990, 55: 121-128.
  • 2Bilbao I, Charco R, Balsells JL, et al. Risk factors for acute renal failure requiring dialysis after liver transplantation . Clin Transplant, 1998, 12: 123-129.
  • 3Lafayette RA, Pare G, Schmid CH, et al. Pretransplant renal dysfunction predicts poorer outcome in liver transplantation. Clin Nephrol, 1997, 48: 159-164.
  • 4Pascual E, Comez-Arnau J, Pensado A, et al. Incidence and risk factors of early acute renal failure in liver transplant patients, Transpl, 1993, 25: 1837-1846.
  • 5徐创新,邓小丽.试论“中学生理解科学探究”评价指标体系的构建[J].化学教育,2009,30(1):10-13. 被引量:6
  • 6Jindal RM, Popescue I. Renal dysfuction associated with liver transplantation. Postgrad Med J, 1995, 71: 513-524.
  • 7Singh N, Gayowski T, Wagener MM. Post-transplantation dialysis-associated infections: morbidity and impact on outcome in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transplantation, 2001, 7: 100-105.
  • 8Harwood W,Reiff R,Phillipson T.(2002).Scientists' conceptions of scientific inquiry:Voices from the front.In P A Rubba,J A Rye,W J DiBiase,B A Crawford (Eds.),Proceedings of the 2002 annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.
  • 9Reiff R R.(2004).Scientists' conceptions of scientific inquiry:Revealing a private side of science.Doctoral dissertation,Indiana University,Bloomington.
  • 10童海云.科学探究结构的再探究[J].科学课(小学版),2008(3):6-8. 被引量:4

二级参考文献16

  • 1陈琴,庞丽娟.科学探究:本质、特征与过程的思考[J].教育科学,2005,21(1):1-5. 被引量:69
  • 2王秀红,历晶.运用科学史培养初中生的科学本质观[J].化学教育,2005,26(12):20-22. 被引量:5
  • 3应向东.“科学探究”教学的哲学思考[J].课程.教材.教法,2006,26(5):64-68. 被引量:34
  • 4郑长龙.关于科学探究教学若干问题的思考[J].化学教育,2006,27(8):6-12. 被引量:27
  • 5National Research Council ( 1996 ). National Science Edueation Standards. National Academy Press. Pp. 124
  • 6[德]E.卡西勒.启蒙哲学[M].顾伟铭等译.山东人民出版社,1988:3.2.11.
  • 7National Academy of Science (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press. Pp. 24 - 27.
  • 8Bybee, R. W. (1996). The Contemporary Reform of Science Education. In Jack Rhoton & Patricia Bowers (eds.) (1996). Issues in Science Education. National Science Teachers Association. Pp. 1 - 14.6.6.
  • 9See Moore, J. A. (1995, January). Cultural and Scientific Literacy. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 6, 1 - 6. Baltimore, MD: American Society of Zoologists. Quoted in Bybee, R. W. , op. cit., Pp. 3-4.
  • 10L. B. Re.snick, “Mathematics and Science Learning: A New Conception,”Science (April 29, 1983): 478.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部