中国哲学社会科学学风规范议题三论——问学于李醒民教授

Three Arguments on Academic Atmosphere for Chinese Philosophy & Social Science——Debate with Professor Li Xingmin

中国哲学社会科学研究中不断提升的理论自由度与学术评价的学科专业化之间事实上陷入到了一对难以相互润合的制肘,而这种制肘客观上逐渐衍生了中国哲学社会科学发展中的诸多新困惑,如学风规范等系列命题。面对这些新困惑,我们绝不能单纯寄望于依赖道德批判去单向抽象破题,而是要深入这些新困惑内部理性挖掘其潜在机理,进而剖析出其背后真实难点,以客观理性态度来具体纠偏中国哲学社会科学学术发展中的诸项困难,从而摈弃毫无意义的道德审判心理,走出学术批判中的伦理性思维左右困局。本文就中国哲学社会科学学风规范议题中的三大关键词:"学术"、"学界"和"学者",与中国科学院李醒民教授提出的"学术断然拒绝平庸"、"学界要以学术为中心和导向"等论点展开商榷。

The rising degree of theoretic freedom of Chinese academic research on philosophy and social sciences and disciplinary academic comments have in fact fallen into a delimma,which has in practice caused many new puzzles,such as series of propositions of academic norms.Facing such puzzles,we cannot fall back on moral criticism to solve the problems.Rather,we should go deep into the puzzles to dig up its inherent principles and find out the true difficulties behind them.We should,with rational attitudes,correct errors that have been made in solving the difficulties in the development of Chinese philosophy and social sciences,discard the senseless psychology of moral trial and walk out of the ethical delimma in academic criticism.This paper makes a comment on three key words in academic norm,i.e.,academic research,academic world and scholars,and hence makes a discussion with Prof.Li Xingmin about such arguments as 'Academic Research Must Decline Mediocrity'and'Academic Research Should Be the Center and Orientation in Academic Circles'.