摘要
《汉书.艺文志》认为,墨家出于"清庙之守",但如果仅将"清庙之守"作"掌管太庙或王祝之官"理解,不完全准确。《汉书.艺文志》以"清庙之守"命墨家,可能由多方面原因促成,但其主要用意应在于以"清庙"与"明堂"相呼应,暗喻墨学并非枯守之说,而亦为治政之术。
Based on the Hanshu Yiwenzhi,the Mohist was officer whose charge was offering sacrifices to gods or ancestors.Just regarding the Mohist as such officer isn't correct.The part about the Mohist in the Hanshu Yiwenzhi may be written for multiple reasons,which aimed to act in coordination to 'Qingmiao' with 'Mingtang'.This metaphored that Mohist's theory isn't monotonous.Contrarily,it is abundant with political strategies.
出处
《学术界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期202-207,288-289,共6页
Academics
基金
安徽大学博士科研启动经费(项目编号:33190100)资助
关键词
墨家
清庙
清庙之守
Mohist
offering sacrifices to gods or ancestors
officers on offering sacrifices to gods or ancestors
