5Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Nonionvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with muhislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging [ J]. Ann Intern Med, 2006, 145: 407 -415.
6Flohr T G, Mccollough C H, Bruder H, et al. First performance e- valuation of a dual - source CT(DSCT) system[ J]. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16(2) :256 -258.
6Brodoefel H,Burgstahler C,Tsiflikas L,et al.Dual-Source CT:effect of heart rate,heart rate variability,and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy1[J].Radiology,2008;247(2):346-55.
7Austen WG,Edwards JE,Frye RL,et al.A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease.Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease,Council on Cardiovascular Surgery,American Heart Association[J].Circulation,1975;51(4):5-40.
8Herzog C,Arning-Erb M,Zangos S,et al.Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography:influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality[J].Radiology,2006;238(1):75-86.
1WU W H, BUDOVEC J, FOLEY W D. Prospective and retrospective ECG gating for thoracic CT angiography: a comparative study [ J ]. AJR, 2009, 193 (4) : 955-963.
2JOHNSON T R, NIKOLAOU K, WINTERSPERGER B J, et al. ECG-gated 64-MDCT angiography in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain[J]. AJR, 2007, 188( l ) : 76-82.
3BRODOEFEL H, REIMANN A, BURGSTAIdLER C, et al. Noninvasivecoronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography innil unselectcd patient collective:effect of heart rate,heart ratevariability and coronary calcifications on image quality anddiagnostic accuracy [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2008, 66 (1): 134-141.
4EVANGEIiSTA A, MUKHEIJEE D, MEHTA R H, et al. Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution [ J ]. Circulation, 2005, 111 ( 8 ) : 1063-1070.
