期刊文献+

食管癌患者术后肿瘤复发和转移的危险因素分析 被引量:19

Risk Factors for Recurrence or Metastasis of Tumor in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma after Esophagectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨影响食管癌患者术后导致肿瘤复发、转移的危险因素,为临床制定术后治疗方案提供依据。方法对2002年1月至2005年1月在甘肃省肿瘤医院行食管癌手术切除的出院患者533例进行随访。纳入随访资料完整、术后生存5年以上并无确切复发、转移的124例患者作为长期生存组,其中男105例,女19例;平均年龄64岁。术后1年内由于肿瘤复发、转移而死亡的62例患者作为短期生存组,其中男56例,女6例;平均年龄62岁。采用单因素分析筛选肿瘤复发、转移的潜在危险因素,进行logistic回归多因素分析筛选危险因素,应用Spearman相关分析法进行相关分析。结果单因素分析结果显示,两组肿瘤长度(χ2=13.459,P=0.001)、肿瘤根治程度(χ2=42.470,P=0.000)、肿瘤分化程度(χ2=11.010,P=0.004)、肿瘤浸润深度(χ2=66.577,P=0.000)、残端情况(χ2=42.740,P=0.000)、有无淋巴结转移(χ2=60.043,P=0.000)以及淋巴结转移数(χ2=72.901,P=0.000)差异均有统计学意义。多因素分析显示肿瘤分化程度[OR=2.444,95%CI(1.205,4.957),P=0.013]、肿瘤浸润深度[OR=6.145,95%CI(3.022,12.495),P=0.000]、有无淋巴结转移[OR=12.151,95%CI(4.961,29.763),P=0.000]、淋巴结转移数[OR=11.935,95%CI(3.492,23.541),P=0.000]和残端情况[OR=13.081,95%CI(2.043,83.775),P=0.007]与食管癌患者预后明显相关。相关分析发现肿瘤浸润深度与有无淋巴结转移呈正相关(r=0.496,P<0.001),肿瘤浸润深度与有淋巴结转移数呈正相关(r=0.519,P<0.001)。结论肿瘤分化程度、肿瘤浸润深度、淋巴结转移和残端情况是影响食管癌患者复发、转移和生存时间的关键因素。目前食管癌TNM分期未能完全反映对预后的影响和指导制定术后综合治疗方案,应从多方位分析相关恶性度生物学行为。 Objective To investigate the prognostic factors of postoperative recurrence or metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and provide a basis for devising a treatment plan. Methods Between January 2002 and January 2005, 533 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent surgical resection and two-field lymphadenectomy in Gansu Tumor Hospital were followed. Of them, 124 patients with 105 males and 19 females and average age of 64 years, survived for more than 5 years without any evidence of recurrence or metastasis (the long-term survival group), and 62 patients with 56 males and 6 females and average age of 62 years, developed recurrence or metastasis and died within 1 year (the short-term survival group). The risk factors for recurrence or metastasis of tumor of the two groups were analyzed by univariate analysis and logistic regression. Spearman analysis was also conducted. Results Univariate analysis demonstrated that significant differences existed between the groups in tumor size(x2 =13. 459,P=0. 001), radicality of resection(x2=42. 470,P=0. 000), grade of differentiation(x2 =11. 010, P=0. 004), pT-stage(xz =66. 577,P=0. 000), margin status(x2 =42, 740,P=0. 000), lymphnode metastasis(x2 = 60. 043, P= 0. 000), and number of lymph nodes involved(x2 = 72. 901, P=0. 000). Multivariate analysis showed that the grade of differentiation at odds ratio(OR) 2. 444 with 95% confidence interval (CD1. 205 to 4. 957 and P=0. 013, lymph node metastasis (OR 12. 151 with 95%CI 4. 961 to 29. 763, P=0. 000), number of lymph nodes involved (OR 11. 935 with 95 % CI3. 492 to 23. 541, P=0. 000), and margin status (OR 13. 081,95%CI 2. 043 to 83. 775, P= 0. 007) were the key factors influencing patient prognosis. Positive correlations were found between pT-stage and lymph node status (r= 0. 496, P〈0. 001), as well as between pT-stage and number of lymph nodes involved (r= 0. 519, P〈0. 001). Conclusions The grade of tumor differentiation, pathology stage, lymphnode metastasis status, and margin status are the main influencing factors in recurrence or metastasis and survival time of patients with ESCC.
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CAS 2011年第6期521-525,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
关键词 食管癌 复发 转移 危险因素 LOGISTIC回归分析 Esophageal carcinoma Recurrence and metastasis Risk factors Logistic regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Earlam R,Cunha-Melo JR.Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma:Ⅰ.A critical review of surgery.Br J Surg,1980:67(6):381-390.
  • 2Wang P,Chien K.Surgical treatment of carcinoma of theesophageal and cardia among the Chinese.Ann Thorac Surg,1983,35(2):143-151.
  • 3张冬坤,苏晓东,林鹏,傅剑华,曾灿光,张兰军,马国伟,朱志华,戎铁华,龙浩.467例Ⅱ期胸段食管鳞癌切除术后患者的生存分析[J].癌症,2008,27(2):113-118. 被引量:23
  • 4Tachibana M,Yoshimura H,Kinugasa S,et al.Clinicopathological features of superficial squamous cell carcinomaof the esophagus.Am J Surg,1997,174(1):49-53.
  • 5Tachibana M,Kinugasa S,Dhar DK,et al.Prognostic factors inT1and T2squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.Arch Surg,1999,134(1):50-54.
  • 6Akiyama H,Tsurumaru M,Udagawa H,et al.Radical lymphnode dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus.Ann Surg,1994,220(3):364-373.
  • 7Kato H,Tachimori Y,Watanabe H,et al.Recurrent esophagealcarcinoma after esophagectomy with three-field lymph nodedissection.J Surg Oncol,1996,61(4):267-272.
  • 8Isono K,Sato H,Nakayama K.Results of a nationwide study onthe three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer.Oncology,1991,48(5):411-420.
  • 9Hoelscher AH,Bollschweiler E,Bumm R,et al.Prognosticfactors of resected adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.Surgery,1995,118(5):845-855.
  • 10Nishimaki T,Suzuki T,Suzuki S,et al.Outcomes of extendedradical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.J Am CollSurg,1998,186(3):306-312.

二级参考文献19

  • 1戎铁华,林鹏,吴一龙.胸段食管癌淋巴结转移的临床研究(附220例分析)[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,1994,10(3):242-244. 被引量:57
  • 2卢珠明,张华,王铭辉,崔东海,杨艳旗,黄洪铮.胸段食管鳞癌淋巴结转移强度和淋巴结清扫手术方式分析[J].癌症,2006,25(5):604-608. 被引量:38
  • 3Rohatgi P R, Correa A M, Swisher S G, et al. Gender-based analysis of esophageal cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation :differences in presentation and therapy outcome [J]. Dis Esophagus, 2006,19(3) : 152-157.
  • 4Hidaki H, Hotokezaka M, Nakashima S, et al. Sex difference in survival of patients treated by surgical resection for esophageal cancer [J]. World J Surg, 2007,31(10) : 1982-1987.
  • 5Elsaleh H, Csemi G, Iacopetta B. Extent of nodal involvement in stage Ⅲ colorectal carcinoma: relationship to clinicopathologic variables and genetic alterations [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(9) : 1218-1222.
  • 6Visbal A L, Williams B A, Nichols F C 3rd, et al. Gender differences in non-small-cell lung cancer survival: an analysis of 4,618 patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2002 [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004,78( 1 ) : 209-215.
  • 7Angele M K, Schwacha M G, Ayala A, et al. Effect of gender and sex hormones on immune responses following shock [J]. Shock, 2000,14(2) :81-90.
  • 8Majetschak M, Christensen B, Obertacke U,et al. Sex differences in posttraumatic cytokine release of endotoxin- stimulated whole blood: relationship to the development of severe sepsis [J]. J Trauma, 2000, 48(5):832-839.
  • 9Shimada H, Okazumi S, Matsubara H, et al. Impact of the number and extent of positive lymph nodes in 200 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after three-field lymph node dissection [J]. World J Surg, 2006,30(8):1441- 1449.
  • 10Wijnhoven B P, Tran K T, Esterman A, et al. An evaluation of prognostic factors and tumor staging of resected carcinoma of the esophagus [J]. Ann Surg, 2007,245(5):717-725.

共引文献22

同被引文献207

引证文献19

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部