期刊文献+

Therapeutic effects of combined oxaliplatin and S-1 in older patients with advanced gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma 被引量:10

Therapeutic effects of combined oxaliplatin and S-1 in older patients with advanced gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To evaluate the effects and safety of combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) and S-1 (SOX regimen) in older patients with advanced gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma (GCA). METHODS: Seventy patients with advanced GCA were classified according to age into an older group (≥ 75 years) and a control group (< 75 years). The SOX regimen was administered to the two groups as follows: S-1 (40 mg/m2 po bid) on days 1 to 14 followed by a 7-d off period, plus L-OHP (65 mg/m2 iv) for 2 h on days 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle. This regimen was repeat-ed for four to six cycles. Response and swallow statuses were evaluated after two cycles (6 wk). Effects and toxicity were evaluated four weeks after chemotherapy was completed. RESULTS: The response rate was 65.6% (21/32) in the older group and 68.4% (26/38) in the control group (χ2 = 0.062 and P = 0.804). Improvement in swallowing was 78.1% (25/32) in the older group and 76.3% (29/38) in the control group (χ2 = 0.032 and P = 0.857). Effi cacy was 68.8% (22/32) in the older group and 65.8% (25/38) in the control group (χ2 = 0.069 and P = 0.793). Toxicities were reversible and similar in both groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The SOX regimen is an effective, safe and well-tolerated regimen for older patients with advanced GCA. AIM:To evaluate the effects and safety of combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) and S-1 (SOX regimen) in older patients with advanced gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma (GCA). METHODS: Seventy patients with advanced GCA were classified according to age into an older group (≥ 75 years) and a control group (〈 75 years). The SOX regimen was administered to the two groups as follows: S-1 (40 mg/m2 po bid) on days 1 to 14 followed by a 7-d off period, plus L-OHP (65 mg/m2 iv) for 2 h on days 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle. This regimen was repeat-ed for four to six cycles. Response and swallow statuses were evaluated after two cycles (6 wk). Effects and toxicity were evaluated four weeks after chemotherapy was completed. RESULTS: The response rate was 65.6% (21/32) in the older group and 68.4% (26/38) in the control group (χ2 = 0.062 and P = 0.804). Improvement in swallowing was 78.1% (25/32) in the older group and 76.3% (29/38) in the control group (χ2 = 0.032 and P = 0.857). Effi cacy was 68.8% (22/32) in the older group and 65.8% (25/38) in the control group (χ2 = 0.069 and P = 0.793). Toxicities were reversible and similar in both groups (P 〉 0.05). CONCLUSION: The SOX regimen is an effective, safe and well-tolerated regimen for older patients with advanced GCA.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第47期5221-5226,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by The National Outstanding Young Scientist Award of China, No. 30025016 State Key Project for Basic Research, No. 30670956 the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, China, No. 0511043200
关键词 胃的心脏的腺癌 OXALIPLATIN S-1 治疗效果 Gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma Oxalipla-tin S-1 Treatment effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献114

  • 1王红岩,高社干,冯笑山,陈建民.食管癌术后吻合口狭窄微波治疗的研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(3):315-316. 被引量:5
  • 2霍裕民,金树文,许孝新,戴炳光,伦冠文,孙丽萍.微波治疗食管癌贲门癌术后吻合口狭窄[J].中华理疗杂志,1995,18(3):164-165. 被引量:7
  • 3李国庆,单根法.微波组织凝因治疗食管癌性梗阻实验和临床研究初报[J].中华理疗杂志,1989,12(3):135-137. 被引量:7
  • 4Munoz N,Franceschi S.Epidemiology of gastric cancer and perspectives for prevention.Salud Publica Mex 1997;39:318-330.
  • 5Kamangar F,Dores GM,Anderson WF.Patterns of cancer incidence,mortality,and prevalence across five continents:defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world.J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2137-2150.
  • 6Glimelius B,Ekstrom K,Hoffman K,Graf W,Sjodén PO,Haglund U,Svensson C,Enander LK,Linné T,Sellstrom H,Heuman R.Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer.Ann Oncol 1997;8:163-168.
  • 7Webb A,Cunningham D,Scarffe JH,Harper P,Norman A,Joffe JK,Hughes M,Mansi J,Findlay M,Hill A,Oates J,Nicolson M,Hickish T,O'Brien M,Iveson T,Watson M,Underhill C,Wardley A,Meehan M.Randomized trial comparing epirubicin,cisplatin,and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil,doxorubicin,and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer.J Clin Oncol 1997;15:261-267.
  • 8Wagner AD,Grothe W,Haerting J,Kleber G,Grothey A,Fleig WE.Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data.J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2903-2909.
  • 9Van Cutsem E,Moiseyenko VM,Tjulandin S,Majlis A,Constenla M,Boni C,Rodrigues A,Fodor M,Chao Y,Voznyi E,Risse ML,Ajani JA.Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer:a report of the V325 Study Group.J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4991-4997.
  • 10Cunningham D,Starling N,Rao S,Iveson T,Nicolson M,Coxon F,Middleton G,Daniel F,Oates J,Norman AR.Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.N Engl J Med 2008;358:36-46.

共引文献63

同被引文献48

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部