期刊文献+

由技术理性主义到整合主义:美国专业取向教师教育课程的演进 被引量:8

From Technical Rationality to Integration:the Development of Professional Orientation Teacher Education Curriculum in the USA
原文传递
导出
摘要 应时代发展要求,美国专业取向教师教育课程思想由技术理性主义向整合主义发展,教学专业化发展也经历了相应的转变。20世纪中下叶占支配性影响地位的技术理性主义教师教育课程,主张对教师进行训练,让其掌握批量的教学技术理论知识。这导致教师教育课程出现理论知识与实践分离、忽视了实践知识的情景性等问题,促使新的教师教育课程理念和实践的出现。整合主义教师教育课程关注对实践知识的情景性关怀、对个体知识的关怀,以解决目前美国乃至国际教师教育面临的问题——提高(职前)教师教学实践能力,强调在合作探究的基础上寻求理论本位与经验本位知识的融合。 What knowledge and ability should teacher have and how to get? It is embodied in the teacher education curriculum system. With the new requirement of age development, the professional orientation teacher education curriculum in the USA has developed from technical rationality to integration, and teacher professional development has gone through two stages, Technical rationality teacher education curriculum has established research knowledge-based and technicism model which have the overwhelming influence in the middle and late 20 century. To take education as a science, then we train teachers and let them master the bulk of the theoretical knowledge of teaching techniques. It also results in problems that the separation of theoretical knowledge and practice, the ignorance of the context of practical knowledge, which facilitates the appearance of integration. Integration teacher education curriculum focuses on the practice knowledge context and personal knowledge, so that to solve the serious problem in the USA and even international teacher education improve the pre-service teacher ability of teaching practice, probe the way to integrate the theory and practice based on the cooperation and exploration, and promote the development of teacher education institution.
作者 戴伟芬
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期75-79,共5页 Research in Educational Development
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划2011年度青年基金项目"基于专业取向的美国教师教育课程思想研究"(11YJC880015) 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题"美国社区学院兼职教师的专业发展及启示--基于‘双师型’教师培养的视角"(GJA114021)的部分成果
关键词 技术理性主义 整合主义 教师教育课程 technical rationality, integration, teacher education curriculum
  • 相关文献

同被引文献96

  • 1潘洪建.论公共教育学课程内容的重建[J].大学(学术版),2009(3):80-84. 被引量:6
  • 2吴刚平.教育经验的意义及其表达与分享[J].全球教育展望,2004,33(8):45-49. 被引量:46
  • 3刘万海.论教学的理性精神[J].全球教育展望,2006,35(6):13-17. 被引量:9
  • 4孙立仁.微格教学理论与实践研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
  • 5联合国教科文组织.教育-财富蕴藏其中[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2005:158.
  • 6[美]唐纳德·A.舍恩.反映的实践者--专业工作者如何在行动中思考[M].夏林清,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2007:42.
  • 7滕明兰.高师公共教育类课程如何从边缘走向中心[J].黑龙江高教研究,2007,25(9):59-61. 被引量:2
  • 8Wolf, D., Bixby, J., & Glenn III, J. To Use Their Minds Well: Investigating New Forms of Student Assessment. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of Research in Education[R]. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 1991o 31-74.
  • 9Shepard, L. A. The Role of Assessment in A Learning Culture[J]. Educational Researcher, 2000, 29 (7):4-14.
  • 10INTASC. Model Standards for Beginning Teacher Licensing and Development: A Resource for State Dialogue[R].Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, 1992o 78-95.

引证文献8

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部