期刊文献+

多事件干扰下工期拖延责任分摊计算 被引量:3

Calculation on construction delay responsibility sharing with multi-event interference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对利用网络分析技术计算工期索赔时常发生的叠加和发散效应,分析了网络计算叠加效应和发散效应的成因,得出了网络计算叠加效应和发散效应分别产生于初始时差和过程时差重复利用的结论.提出了多事件干扰下工期拖延责任分摊原则和计算方法.该方法认为时差应为承包商和业主双方共同所有,直接针对双方因时差优先使用权产生的争议,即网络计算叠加效应和发散效应产生的附加值.当在时差的使用上不发生争议时,任何一方都可以随意使用时差.如果发生争议,则争议时差应在业主和承包商之间平均分摊.该方法坚持了公平原则,很大程度上化解了承包商和业主之间的争议,同时对共同延误也具有适用性. Compared to the independent analysis of contractor-risk and owner-risk delay events,integrated analysis for all delay events using CPM(critical path method) scheduling techniques will have different results which are called the phenomenon of superposition effect and divergent effect.Root causes of this phenomenon are discussed in detail in this paper.Superposition and divergent effect are closely related to the reuse of total float and newly created total float time for both the contractor and the owner.Under current scheduling practices,total float is considered to be an asset for both the contractor and the owner to use for free.Newly created total float is produced by project delays caused by the contractor or the owner.Based on the consideration of the ownership and utilization of total float and newly created total float,the principle for the allocation of the outcome of superposition and divergent effect has been proposed.The new concept makes a direct response to the focus of disputes for superposition and divergent effect.Calculation methods for the allocation of delay responsibility are proposed.
出处 《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期188-193,共6页 Journal of Southeast University:Natural Science Edition
基金 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目(CXZZ11-0182)
关键词 工期拖延 争议 时差 叠加和发散效应 construction delay claims float superposition and divergent effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Society of Construction Law. Delay and disruption pro- tocol [EB/OL]. (2004) [2011-03-04]. http://www. eotprotocol, com.
  • 2Gothand K D. Schedule delay analysis: modified win- dows approach [ J ]. Cost Engineering, 2003, 45 (9) : 18 - 23.
  • 3Householder J L, Rutland H E. Who owns float? [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1990, 116(1) : 130-133.
  • 4de La Garza J M, Vorster M C, Parvin C M. Total float traded as commodity [ J ]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1991, 117 ( 4 ) : 716-- q97.
  • 5Wickwire J M, Warner T, Berry M R. Construction scheduling: preparation, liability, and claims [ M ]. New York: Wiley Law Publication, 1991.
  • 6de Leon Gui Ponce. Float ownership-some recommen- dations [J]. Stratagem, 1982, 1(1): 55-72.
  • 7de La Garza J M, Prateapusanond A, Ambani N. Preal- location of total float in the application of a critical path method based construction contract [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2007, 133 ( 11 ): 836 - 845.
  • 8Ambani N. Bookkeeping procedures for the application of the concept of preallocation of total float [ D ].Blacksburg, VA, USA: University of Virginia Polytech- nic and State, 2004.
  • 9彭慧杰.基于TIA的工期延误分析[J].青岛建筑工程学院学报,2005,26(1):91-96. 被引量:9
  • 10郭汉丁,郑丕谔,郝海.工期索赔分析中网络计算的叠加和发散效应[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2003,35(1):56-62. 被引量:17

二级参考文献16

  • 1吴鼎贤.应用动态规划安排施工计划[J].建筑技术,1996,23(12):844-845. 被引量:2
  • 2陈松.建筑工程索赔[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,1995..
  • 3[2]H. N. 阿龙加著. 袁子仁等译. 网络法施工管理[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1987.
  • 4薛嘉庆.最优化原理与方法[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,1994.
  • 5成虎,建筑工程合同与索赔,1996年
  • 6陈松,建筑工程索赔,1995年
  • 7陈贵民.建筑工程施工索赔与反索赔[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998..
  • 8Janet R, Yates & John H. Audi, Using Decision support Systems for Delay Analysis: The Project Management Perception Program.Project Management Journal. 1998,29(2) : 29-38.
  • 9Barry B,Bramble & Micheal T. Callaham. Construction Delay Claims (Second Edition) John willey & Sons,Inc. , 1992.
  • 10David Ariditi ,Bhupendra K. Pate(1989), Impact Analysis of Owner-Directed Acceleration. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1989,115(1): 144-157.

共引文献24

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部