期刊文献+

从层级性信息的处理看法庭交互中态度指向的实现 被引量:3

Realization of Objectives of Participants in Courtroom Interaction:From the Perspective of Hierarchical Information Processing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在以辩论为主要特点的法庭交互过程中,各方参与人都有确定的态度指向,包括共同追究、单方追究、共同放弃、单方放弃、共同回避和单方回避,直接影响着法庭交互的方向、内容和质量。各方态度指向的具体实现取决于对法庭信息的即时处理。交互中的态度指向、社会关系、信息处理策略、信息处理手段等是信息处理分析模式的主要构成部分。 In courtroom interaction characterized by argumentation,all participants have clear objectives to achieve.Such objectives as co-pursuance,uni-pursuance,co-abandonment,uni-abandonment,co-evasion and uni-evasion have a decisive impact on the direction,content and quality of the interaction.The realization of the objectives depends upon the immediate processing of the courtroom information.Together with these objectives,social relations of the participants,strategies and linguistic devices are the components comprising the model for analyzing courtroom information processing.
作者 杜金榜
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期7-12,125,共6页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Beyssade, Claire & Jean-Marie, Marandin. Topic marking, discourse topic and discourse moves [ R]. The Workshop on Information Structure in Context, University of Stuttgart, Germany, 2002, Nov. : 15- 16.
  • 2Bialystok, E. Communication Strategies [ M ]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
  • 3Btiring, D. Focus and topic in a complex model of discourse [C] //Krifka Geurts & van der Sandt. Focus and Presupposition in a Multi-speaker Discourse. ESSLI-99 Workshop Reader, 1999.
  • 4Baring, D. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents [ J ]. Lin- guistics & Philosophy, 2003, 25 (5): 511 -545.
  • 5Callow, Kathleen. Man and Message : A Guide to Meaning- Based Text Analysis [ M ]. New York: University Press of America, 1998.
  • 6Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob, Grootendorst. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions [ M ]. Dordrecht : Foils Publications, 1983.
  • 7Feteris, E. T. A dialogical theory of legal discussions : Pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation [J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2000, 8 (2 -3) : 115 - 135.
  • 8Folger, Joseph P. & Marshall Scott, Poole. Working Through Conflict: A Communication Perspective [ M]. Glenview, IlL : Scott, Foresman, 1984.
  • 9Gilbert, Michael A. Coalescent Argumentation [M]. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
  • 10Griffin, Em. A First Look at Communication Theory [ M ]. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991.

同被引文献81

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部