期刊文献+

Marginal revenue of land and total factor productivity in Chinese agriculture: Evidence from spatial analysis 被引量:13

Marginal revenue of land and total factor productivity in Chinese agriculture: Evidence from spatial analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper attempts to explore the temporal and spatial nature of the marginal revenue of land, total factor productivity (TFP) change and its three components: technical change (TC), technical efficiency change (TEC) and scale efficiency change (SEC) as seen in Chinese agricultural production from 1995 to 1999. Based on county-level data, the study utilized both stochastic frontier and mapping analyses methods. The results show that growth in the marginal revenue of land was diverse across various regions, where most gain occurred in eastern coastal zone, while loss was in Northwest and North China. China has experienced moderate decreases in annual TFP change (–0.26%) with considerable regional variations. Specifically, the administrative intervention in grain production and the deterioration of the agricultural technology diffusion system led to a moderate drop in annual TFP change. County-level mapping analyses took into account interregional variances in TFP and its components. Regarding components of TFP, TEC differences explain the majority of regional dispersions in TFP. As developed areas in China, the Huang-Huai-Hai region and the Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan economic zone face the challenges of land conversion and grain security amidst the process of urbanization. This paper attempts to explore the temporal and spatial nature of the marginal revenue of land, total factor productivity (TFP) change and its three components: technical change (TC), technical efficiency change (TEC) and scale efficiency change (SEC) as seen in Chinese agricultural production from 1995 to 1999. Based on county-level data, the study utilized both stochastic frontier and mapping analyses methods. The results show that growth in the marginal revenue of land was diverse across various regions, where most gain occurred in eastern coastal zone, while loss was in Northwest and North China. China has experienced moderate decreases in annual TFP change (–0.26%) with considerable regional variations. Specifically, the administrative intervention in grain production and the deterioration of the agricultural technology diffusion system led to a moderate drop in annual TFP change. County-level mapping analyses took into account interregional variances in TFP and its components. Regarding components of TFP, TEC differences explain the majority of regional dispersions in TFP. As developed areas in China, the Huang-Huai-Hai region and the Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan economic zone face the challenges of land conversion and grain security amidst the process of urbanization.
出处 《Journal of Geographical Sciences》 SCIE CSCD 2012年第1期167-178,共12页 地理学报(英文版)
基金 National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program),No.2010CB950904 National Key Technology R&D Program of China,No.2008BAK50B06 No.2008BAC43B01 National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.40801231 No.41071343
关键词 TFP change grain production technology efficiency change Chinese agriculture TFP change grain production technology efficiency change Chinese agriculture
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献25

  • 1Cane M A, Eshel G, Buckland R W, 1994. Forecasting Zimbabwean maize yield using eastern equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature. Nature, 370: 204-205.
  • 2CNBS, 2005. China National Statistics Bureau Agriculture Production Database. Beijing: China Agricultural Press.
  • 3Dawe D, Moya P, Casiwan C (eds.), 2006. Why does the Philippines import rice? Meeting the challenge of trade liberalization. Los Bafios, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice).
  • 4Dawe D, Moya P, Valencia S, 2008. Institutional, policy and farmer responses to drought: El Nino events and rice in the Philippines. Disasters, 33(2): 291-307.
  • 5Falcon W E Naylor R L, Smith W, 2004. Using climate models to improve Indonesian food security. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 40(3): 355-377.
  • 6Fan S, Ruttan V, 1992. Technical change in centrally planned economies, agricultural economics. The Journal of International Association of Agricultural Economists, 6:301-314.
  • 7FAO, 2006. FAOSTAT agriculture data. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
  • 8Hansen J W, Hodges A W, Jones J W, 1998. ENSO influences on agriculture in the southeastern United States. Journal of Climate, 11 : 404-411.
  • 9Huang J, Rozelle S, 1995. Environmental stress and grain yields in China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77: 853-864.
  • 10Huang J, Lin Y, Martin W, 2009. Will changes in trade and domestic distortions affecting China's agriculture? Food Policy, 34:407-416.

共引文献6

同被引文献271

引证文献13

二级引证文献223

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部