期刊文献+

影响AHM与DINA诊断准确率的因素研究 被引量:11

The Research on Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy in AHM and DINA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对属性层级模型(AHM)和确定性输入、噪声"与"门模型(DINA)2个认知诊断模型,讨论不同因素对判准率的影响.实验表明,含有可达阵的测验比不含可达阵的测验判准率高.对于线型结构测验长度达到一定值以后,增加测验长度对诊断准确率的改进不大.虽然总体而言,DINA分类准确性要优于AHM,属性结构紧密度越大,判准率越高;但是AHM估计结果符合属性层级结构,而DINA估计结果却可能违背属性层级关系,这和2011年De Carlo的发现不相同. Cognitive diagnostic theory is the product of combination cognitive psychology with modern psychological and educational measurement and it is a core of the new theoretical generation. Various factors, such as attribute hierarchy, test blueprint and test length, and the quality of the items, i.e., the quantity of the slip attached to an item will affect the accuracy of diagnosis to some extent. Based on two diagnosis models AHM and DINA, affecting degree of different factors to accuracy index of classification is investigated in the paper. The results show different factors have varying degree of influence on the accuracy of diagnosis. Test-length is not the longer the better when attribute structure is linear. Different test blueprint has varying degree of influence on the diagnostic accuracy. A cognitive test that contains reachability matrix has a higher classification accuracy rate than that of not contained. The higher the slip, the lower the pattern and the marginal classification accuracy rate are. The more compact the attribute hierarchy, the higher classification accuracy rate. AHM is more sensitive to attribute construction, while DINA is not. Generally speaking, the accuracy of classification of DINA is higher than AHM, but sometimes DINA model may provide some unreasonable estimate of knowledge states. This finding does not coincide with DeCarlo's conclusion.
出处 《江西师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第6期640-645,共6页 Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金(30860084 60263005 31160203 31100756) 教育部人文社会科学基金(11YJC190002) 全国教育考试"十一五"科研规划2009年度课题(2009JKS2009) 江西省教育厅青年科学基金(GJJ10238)资助项目
关键词 认知诊断 属性层级模型 确定性输入噪声“与”门模型 可达矩阵 cognitive diagnosis AHM(attribute hierarchy model) DINA (deterministic inputs, noisy "and" gate) classification approach reachability matrix
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Leighton J P, Gierl M J. Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education: theory and applications [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • 2陈德枝,戴海琦,赵顶位.规则空间方法与属性层次方法的诊断准确性比较[J].心理科学,2009,32(2):414-416. 被引量:6
  • 3Leighton J P, Gierl M J, Hunka SM. The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment: a variation on Tatsuoka's rule-space approach [J]. Journal of Education Measurement, 2004(3),205-237.
  • 4de la Torre J, Yuan H. Factors affecting the item parameter estimation and classification accuracy of the DINA model [J]. Journal of Educational Measurement Summer, 2010, 47(2): 227-249.
  • 5Mao mengmeng, Wang peng, Ding shuliang. A note on attribute hierarchy method [J]. International Journal of Digital Content Techmology and its Applications, 2011 (10): 53-59.
  • 6Ding Shuliang, Luo Fen, Lin Haijing, et al. Complement to Q matrix theory[C]//Shigemasu K, Okata A, Imaizumi T, et al. New trends in psychometrics. Tokyo: Universal Academy Press, 2008: 417-424.
  • 7丁树良,杨淑群,汪文义.可达矩阵在认知诊断测验编制中的重要作用[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,34(5):490-494. 被引量:81
  • 8杨淑群,蔡声镇,丁树良,林海菁,丁秋林.求解简化Q矩阵的扩张算法[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2008,44(3):87-91. 被引量:39
  • 9周婕,丁树良,陈平.多级评分CAT的认知诊断方法[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,31(4):375-378. 被引量:9
  • 10De Carlo L T. On the analysis of fraction subtraction data: The DINA model, classification, latent class sizes, and the Q-matrix [J]. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011, 35(1): 8-26.

二级参考文献38

  • 1戴海崎,张青华.规则空间模型在描述统计学习模式识别中的应用研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):949-951. 被引量:39
  • 2余嘉元.运用规则空间模型识别解题中的认知错误[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):196-203. 被引量:40
  • 3李领治,郑洪源,吴笑凡,丁秋林.应用层QOS选播流路由优化系统的构架与实现[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2006,42(2):86-91. 被引量:2
  • 4周庆国,周睿,程广辉,李廉.一种简单高效IPv6隧道代理的实现[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2006,42(5):73-75. 被引量:2
  • 5L. V. DiBello, L. A. Roussos and William Stout. Review of Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment and a Summary of Psychometric Models. Handbook of Statistics, 2007, 26(1) :979 - 1030.
  • 6K. K. Tatsuoka. Architecture of Knowledge Structures and Cognitive Diagnosis: A Statistical Pattern Recognition and Classification Approach. In: Paul D. Nichols, Susan F. Chipman, Robert L. Brennan. Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment. Lawrence ERlabum Associates, Publishers, 1995:327 - 359.
  • 7J.P. Leighton, M.J. Gierl, and S.M. Hunka. The Attribute Hierarchy Method for Cognitive Assessment: A Variation on Tatsuoka' s Rule - Space Approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004, 41(3):205-236.
  • 8B.W. Junker, Klaas Sijtsma. Cognitive Assessment Models With Few Assumptions and Connections With Nonparametric Item Response Theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2001, 25 (3) : 258 - 272.
  • 9Jian - bing Wen. Application of the Rule Space Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing for Diagnostic Assessment. Hong Kong Doctoral Dissertation, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, July 2003. pp37 - 72,79 - 108.
  • 10K.K. Tatsuoka and M. M. Tatsuoka. Computerized Cognitive Diagnostic Adaptive Testing: Effect on Remedial Instruction as Empirical Validation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1997, 34(1): 3-20.

共引文献98

同被引文献107

  • 1何学文,赵海鸣.支持向量机及其在机械故障诊断中的应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2005,36(1):97-101. 被引量:46
  • 2Templin, J. L. & Henson, R. A. Measurement of Psychological Disorders Using Cognitive Diagnosis models [ J]. Psychological Methods, 2006, 11 (3) : 287 - 305.
  • 3de la Torre, J. DINA Model Parameter Estimation: A Didactic [ J ]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2009, (34) : 115 - 130.
  • 4詹沛达,王立君.一种基于认知诊断理论的因素诊断法[C].广州:第十五届全国心理学学术会议,2012:75-76.
  • 5Leighton, J. P. , Cui, Y. , & Cor, M. K. Testing Expert- based and Student- based Cognitive Models: An Application of the Attribute Hierarchy Method and Hierarchy Consistency Index [ J]. Applied Measurement in Education, 2009, 22(3) : 229 - 254.
  • 6Leighton, J. P. , Gierl, M. J. , & Hunka, S. M. Tb.e Attrl.hute Hierarchy Method for Cognitive Assessment: A Variation on Tatsuka's Rule - space Approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004, 41 (3) : 205 - 237.
  • 7Airasian, P. W. (2001). Classroom assessment (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • 8Briggs, D. C., & Alonzo, A. C. (2009, June). The psychometric modeling of ordered multiple-choice item responses for diagnostic assessment with a learning progression.
  • 9de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45 343-362.
  • 10de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2008). Model evaluation and multiple strategies in cognitive diagnosis: An analysis of fraction subtraction data. Psychometrika, 73(4), 595-624.

引证文献11

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部