期刊文献+

慈善捐赠的股市效应及其影响因素再研究——基于调整的市场模型和非参检验方法 被引量:7

A New Study about Market Effect of Philanthropic Giving and Influencing Factors——Based on Adjusted Market Model and Non-parametric Test Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以74家上市公司为样本,根据调整的市场模型和非参检验方法,在增加模型检验期的基础上对玉树地震后企业慈善捐赠的股市效应进行了估计判断,并实证分析了股市效应的影响因素。研究表明,调整的市场模型预测能力显著提高,企业慈善捐赠对股市有明显的负向冲击效应,并随着时间推延和捐赠信息的扩散而逐渐弱化。政府控制型企业捐赠获得的股市效应明显低于非政府控制型企业,捐赠比率与股市效应显著正相关,而捐赠金额并非投资者反应的直接根据。 Using adjusted market model and non-parameter test method and adding test period,this paper makes an empirical study about the market effect of philanthropic giving and its influencing factors after Yushu Earthquake,based on a sample of 74 Chinese listed companies.The results indicate that adjusted market model's predicted power is much better than market model,and symbolic test method and kernel density estimate both show that philanthropic giving does have a negative market effect,and the effect gradually weaken as market message spreads.Moreover,listed firms of government control style gain averagely lower cumulative abnormal return than that of non-government control style.The market effect is significantly positively correlates to the donation ratio,while donation amount is not the factor.
作者 陈立泰 张勇
出处 《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期65-71,共7页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目"重庆企业责任竞争力治理机制研究"(编号CDJSK10027)之研究成果
关键词 慈善捐赠 股市效应 影响因素 调整的市场模型 非参检验 Philanthropic giving Stock market effect Influencing factors Adjusted market model Non-parametric test
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Carroll A B. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders [ J] . Business Horizons, 1991, 34: 39-48.
  • 2Smith C. The New Corporate Philanthropy [J] . Harvard Business Review, 1994, 72 (3) : 105-116.
  • 3Godfrey P C. The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective [ J ] . Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30 (4): 777-798.
  • 4Gardberg N. A. and C. J. Fombrun. Corporate Citizenship: Creating Intangible Assets Across Institutional Environments [J] . Academy of Management Review , 2006, 34:329 - 346.
  • 5Arthur M. Share Price Reactions to Work-family Initiatives : An institutional Perspective [ J] . Academy of Management Journal, 2003,46 : 497 -505.
  • 6Hillman, A. , Keim, G. Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: What' s the bottom line? [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22: 125-139.
  • 7Friedman, M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits [J], New York Times Magazine September, 1970, 13:122 - 126.
  • 8Wokutch, R. E. , B. A. Spencer. Corporate Saint and Sinners: The Effects of Philanthropic and Illegal Activity on Organizational Performance [J] . California Management Review, 1987, 29 (2) : 62 - 77.
  • 9Patten D M. Does the Market Value Corporate Philanthropy : Evidence From the Response to the 2004 Tsunami Relief Effort [ J ] . Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 81 (3): 599-607.
  • 10Muller, A. , Kraiussl R. Do Markets Love Misery? Stock Prices and Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response [ J] . Proceedings of the Sixty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 2008, ISSN 1543-$643.

二级参考文献98

共引文献245

同被引文献84

引证文献7

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部