期刊文献+

正中旁入路单侧椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗腰椎间盘突出伴腰椎不稳症 被引量:6

Paramedian Approach with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Disc Herniation Combined with Lumbar Instability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨正中旁入路单侧椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗腰椎间盘突出合并腰椎不稳症的疗效。方法:2007年2月8—2009年3月33例腰椎间盘突出合并腰椎不稳症的患者(男性20例,女性13例;年龄35~52岁,平均年龄40.5岁),采用正中旁入路单侧椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗。对术前和术后随访时的日本骨科协会评估治疗分数(JOA)评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、植骨融合率进行观察分析,并评价患者的腰椎功能改善情况及手术疗效。结果:手术时间为(110±16.8)min,术中出血量为(206±40.1)mL。患者随访时间平均为26.7个月。JOA评分术前平均为(8.1±0.9)分,术后末次随访时为(14.2±0.5)分,术后平均改善率为88.4%,其中优级改善率(75%~100%)31例(93.9%),良级改善率(50%~74%)1例(3.0%),可级改善率为(25%~49%)1例(3.10%)。优良率为96.9%。VAS评分术前为(7.9±0.4)分,术后末次随访时为(1.9±0.5)分.下降了75.9%。所有患者随访期间X线检查提示椎间融合器无移位及沉降,内固定无松动、断裂等,椎间植骨均获得骨性融合,植骨融合率为100%。所有病例末次随访时JOA评分及VAS评分与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:采用正中旁入路单侧椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎间盘突出合并腰椎不稳症效果优良,具有操作简单、创伤小的特点,可有效改善患者的临床症状,促进神经功能的恢复。 Objective:To discuss the clinical effects of the paramedian approach with unilateral pedicle screw fixation on the lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar instability.Methods:From February 2007 to March 2009,a total of 33 cases(20 males,13 females, 35-52 years of age,average 40.5 years) of lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar instability were treated with unilateral pedicle screw fixation by the paramedian approach.The Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) and visual analogue scale(VAS) scores before and after surgery and the fusion rate were analyzed during the follow-up period.The improvement in the lumbar spine function and clinical effects of the surgery on the patients were also evaluated.Results:The average operation time and blood loss were (11(1±16.8)min and(206±40.1 )mL respectively.The average follow-up period of the patients was 26.7 months.The average preoperative JOA score was(8.1±0.9) and the average JOA score at the last follow-up was(14.2±0.5).The average postoperative improvement rate was 88.4%with 31 cases of excellent improvement rate(93.9%),1 case of good improvement rate(3.0%) and 1 case of fair improvement rate(3.0%).The excellent and good improvement rate was 96.9%.The preoperative VAS score was(7.9±0.4) and the VAS score at the last follow-up was(1.9±0.5) with a 75.9 precent decrease.No cage displacement or settlement and implant loosening or breakage in this group were found by the radiological examination during the follow-up period,and bony fusion was achieved in all patients with a 100 percent fusion rate.Statistical analysis revealed significant differences(P〈0.05) between the preoperative JOA or VAS scores and the JOA or VAS scores at the last follow-up.Conclusions:Good clinical outcomes in the treatment of the lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar instability are achieved using the paramedian approach with unilateral pedicle screw fixation.This technique has advantages of less trauma and easy manipulation,can effectively alleviate the patients' symptoms and advance the neural functional recovery.
出处 《中国临床医学》 2011年第6期828-831,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
基金 浙江省嘉兴市科技计划项目(编号:2011AY1053-3)
关键词 正中旁入路 单侧椎弓根螺钉内固定 腰椎不稳症 Paramedian approach Unilateral pedicle screw fixation Lumbar instability
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, et al. Age distribution of three radiologic factors for lumbar instabilityl probable ag- ing process of the instability with disc degeneration [J]. Spine, 2003, 28(23)~ 2628-2633.
  • 2Schulte TL, Leistra F, Bullmann V, et al. Disc height reduc- tion in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360fusion[J]. Eur Spine, 2007, 16(2): 2152-2158.
  • 3Sehwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, et al. Minimally in- vasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) : tech- nical feasibility and initial results[J]. J Spinal Dissord Teeh, 2005, 18(Suppl).. 1-6.
  • 4Watkins MB. Posterolateral bonegrafting for fusion of the lumbar and lumbaosacral spine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1959, 41- A(3) : 388-396.
  • 5Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et aI. The paraspi- nal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1968, 50(5) :919-926.
  • 6Laasonen EM. Atrophy of sacrospinal muscle groups in pa- tients with chronic diffusely radiating lumbar back pain[J]. Neuroradiology, 1984, 26 (1): 9 13.
  • 7汪冉,杨永宏,楼肃亮,郑杰,赵志芳.后路经椎旁肌间隙椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2010,25(7):609-610. 被引量:28
  • 8方向前,胡志军,范顺武,赵兴,黄悦,赵凤东,陈剑.胸腰段骨折经肌间隙入路与传统入路内固定的比较研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(4):315-319. 被引量:136
  • 9Nagata H, Schendel MJ, Transfeldt EE, et al. The effects ofimmobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion[J]. Spine, 1993, 18(16) : 2471-2479.
  • 10Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, et al. Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its e{fects on adjacent motion seg- ments in the lumbosacral spine[J]. Spine, 1998, 23 (14) .- 1550-1558.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1968, 50: 919-926.
  • 2Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine, 1997, 22: 1018-1023.
  • 3Thesleff S, Ward MR. Studies on the mechanism of fibrillation potentials in denervated muscle. J Physiol, 1975, 244: 313-323.
  • 4Watkins MB. Posterolateral bonegrafting for fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1959, 41: 388-396.
  • 5Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine, 2002, 27: E29-36.
  • 6Shindo H. Anatomical study of the lumbar muhifidus muscle and its innervation in human adults and fetuses. Nippon Ika Daigaku Zasshi, 1995, 62: 439-446.
  • 7Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lmnbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine, 1996, 21: 2683-2688.
  • 8Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguehi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance afler posterior lumbar surgery. Spine, 1999, 24: 1023-1028.
  • 9Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et aI. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine, 2004, 29: 1938-1944.
  • 10Wihse LL, Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine, 1988, 13: 696-706.

共引文献167

同被引文献54

  • 1王轩获,戈朝晖,陈振,丁惠强,赵浩宁,马荣,张惠勇,梁思敏,锁志刚,马宗军.两种术式治疗腰椎间盘突出症并节段不稳的疗效比较[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2013,35(3):266-269. 被引量:8
  • 2中药新药治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究指导原则(草案)[J].中国中医骨伤科,1995,3(5):52-53. 被引量:147
  • 3毛宾尧.正确把握腰椎间盘突出髓核摘除后椎间融合问题[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(15):1198-1198. 被引量:4
  • 4Takahashi Y,Sato T,IIyodo H,et al.Incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery:risk factors and anatomic locations:clinical article[J]. J Neurosurg Spine,2013,18(2):165-169.
  • 5Kim HJ,Bak KH,Chun HJ,et al.Posterior interspinous fusion device for one-level fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease:comparison with pedicle screw fixation-preliminary report of at least one year follow up[J].J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2012,52(4):359-364.
  • 6Shirzadi A,Birch K,Drazin I),et al.Direct lateral interbody fusion(DLIF) at the lumbosacral junction L5-S1[J].J Clin Neurosci,2012,19(7):1022-1025.
  • 7Smith WD,Christian G,Serrano S,et al.A comparison of perioperative charges and outcome between open and mini-open approaches for anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion[J].J Clin Neurosci,2012,19(5):673-680.
  • 8Dimar JR 2nd,Glassman SD,Vemuri VMTet al.Lumbar lordosis restoration following single-level instrumented fusion comparing 4 commonly used techniques[J].Orthopedics,2011,34(ll):e760-e764.
  • 9Guerin P1Obeid I,Bourghli A,et al.The lumbo- sacral plexus:anatomic considerations for minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach[J].Surg Radiol Anat,2012,34(2):151-157.
  • 10张剑,颜碧清,徐俊龙,许伟海.创伤性休克患者血清TNF-α、IL-6变化的意义[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2008,18(2):103-104. 被引量:14

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部