摘要
恢复性司法以其特有的冲突解决方式实现了传统刑事司法很难实现的社会效果,得到联合国的肯定与推广,也十分契合我国构建和谐社会的目标,但由于采取非诉讼和非刑罚的方式,加害人与受害人在冲突的解决中居于主导地位,颠覆了传统司法的国家主导及刑罚为主的模式,尽管具有良好的社会效果,但其公平与正义性却遭到质疑,成为在我国确立推行的障碍。辨析体现公平正义的传统刑事司法基本原则,恢复性司法的正义价值不容置疑。
Restorative justice with its unique way of conflict resolution achieves the social effect which is difficult for the traditional criminal justice to do so,gaining recognition and promotion of the United Nations,and it is also suitable for building a harmonious society.However,due to non-litigation and non-punitive manner,the perpetrators and the victim are in the dominant position in the conflict resolution,subverting the traditional state-led administration of justice and punishment-based model.So despite the good social effect,fairness and justice of restorative justice have been questioned,which becomes implementation obstacles in our country.We should analyze fairness and justice of the basic principles of traditional criminal justice,and restorative justice is no doubt of the value of justice.
出处
《天津法学》
2011年第4期35-40,共6页
Tianjin Legal Science
关键词
恢复性司法
刑事法治原则
正义价值
restorative justice
criminal government by law principle
justice value