摘要
目前我国的审判委员会议案机制存在审判分离、缺乏有效质证、违背控辨平等原则等问题。通过在审判委员会议案机制中适用证据规则,可以对审判委员会的证据审查、质证、判断和采信活动进行有效的规制,从而有效保障当事人的合法权益和案件的审理质量。
Currently, there are some problems existing in judicial committee bill mechanism in China, such as trial and sentence seperation, lack of effective cross-examination, and inequality between the prosecution and the defense, etc..By applying the applicable evidence rules, we may effectively regulate the following activities of judicial committee: evidence review, cross-examination, judgement and admission. In this way, we can effectively safeguard the legal rights of parties and the trial quality of the case.
出处
《医学与法学》
2011年第1期64-66,共3页
Medicine and Jurisprudence
基金
本文为基金项目.系湖南省社会科学基金项目“刑事裁判程序精密化及其构建”的部分成果,项目编号:08YBB063.
关键词
审判委员会议案机制
证据规则
诉讼化
judicial committee bill mechanism
evidence regulation
lawsuit