期刊文献+

75例骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的微创治疗 被引量:5

Mini-invasive Treatment for 75 Patients of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价经皮椎体成形术和经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的效果。方法 75例骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者108个椎体,在C型臂X线透视下,经皮穿刺,在病椎注入聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯。术前及术后1 d进行疼痛视觉类比评分,并进行统计学分析。同时记录骨水泥渗漏情况。结果 75例患者治疗后疼痛较治疗前有明显好转,VAS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。经皮椎体成形术组和经皮椎体后凸成形术组病例术后疼痛改善比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组平均单个椎体手术时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),经皮椎体后凸成形术组手术时间明显长于经皮椎体成形术组。结论经皮椎体成形术和经皮椎体后凸成形术属微创手术,该手术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折止痛效果明显。 Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCF).Methods The 108 osteopomtic vertebral compression fractures in 75 patients were injected polymethymethacrylate(PMMA) with a bone marrow biopsy needle under the guidance of C-arm fluoroscopy.Visual analogue scale(VAS) was evaluated one day before and after PVP or PKP therapy,and the PMMA leakage was recorded.Results After PVP or PKP,the pain was relieved considerably in all the 75 patients.The difference was significant in VAS(P0.01).The post-operational pain relief in PVP group and PKP group had no statistical difference(P0.05).The average operation time for each centrum was significantly different between the two groups(P0.01).PKP group used more time than PVP group.Conclusion PVP and PKP are both mini-invasive techniques which are effective in relieving the pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
出处 《中华全科医学》 2012年第2期195-197,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
关键词 经皮椎体成形术 经皮椎体后凸成形术 骨质疏松 脊柱压缩骨折 Percutaneous vertebroplasty Percutaneous kyphoplasty osteoporosis Vertebral compres sion fracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

共引文献77

同被引文献46

  • 1张强,邹德威,海涌,白克文,马华松.球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松压缩骨折的初步结果[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(5):497-498. 被引量:23
  • 2Kumar K,Nguyen R,Bishop S.A comparative analysis of the results of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in osteopomtc vertebral com- pression fractures[J] .Neurosurgery,2011,67(3) 171-188.
  • 3Rapan S ,Jovanovic S, Gulan G ,et al.Vertebroplasty-high viscosi- tycement versus low viscosity cement[J].Coll Antropo1,2010,34(3): 1063-1067.
  • 4Belkoff SM, Mathi s JM, Jasper LE, et al. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: the effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior [J]. Spine,2011,36(14):1537-1541.
  • 5Dwornik M, Knjawa J, Bialoszewski D, et al. Electromyographic and clinical evaluation of the efficacy of neuromobilization in patients with low hack pain [J]. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil,2009,11 (2):164-176.
  • 6Kumar K, Nguyen R, Bishop S. A comparative analysis of the results of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures [J]. Neurosurgery,2011,67(3): 171-188.
  • 7Rapan S, Jovanovic S, Gulan G, et al. Vertebroplasty-high viscositycement versus low viscosity cement [J]. Coil Antropol, 2010,34(3):1063-1067.
  • 8Chen LH, Lai PL, Chen WJ. Unipedicle percutaneous vertebro- plasty for spinal intraosseous vacuum cleft [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2012,48(435):148-153.
  • 9Yamada K, Matsumoto Y, Kita M, et al. Long-term pain relief effects in four patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty for metastatic vertebral tumor [J].J Anesth,2004,18(4) : 292-295.
  • 10戴鸣海,刘良乐.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松脊柱压缩性 骨折疗效及并发症分析[J].中国当代医药,2012,19( 12):30-31.

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部