中美未决羁押审查程序比较研究

Comparative Study on Review Procedures of Custody Pending between China and America

我国未决羁押采取行政化的审查方式加之缺乏其他的配套制度,导致司法实践中侵犯犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法权利的现象时有发生。完善我国未决羁押审查程序,应首先将羁押同拘留、逮捕分离,引入羁押听证程序,并赋予犯罪嫌疑人、被告人不服听证结果的上诉权、申诉权和定期申请审查权。

Custody pending of our country takes the way of administrative review and lacks of other supporting systems,so the legal rights of criminal suspects and defendants are often violated in judicial practice.In order to improve the review procedures of custody pending of our country,we should firstly separate custody from detention and arrest,and then introduce custody hearing procedures.We also should give the right of appeal,the right to appeal and the right to apply for review on a regular basis for the criminal suspects and defendants if they refuse to accept the result of hearing.