期刊文献+

虚假广告代言人责任刍议——以《食品安全法》第55条为视角 被引量:1

On the Responsibility of Spokesmen for False Advertising——From the Perspective of No.55 of "Food Safety Law"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 广告代言人与经营者的地位、性质不同,广告中的代言人的言行不具有可信赖性,代言人在广告中也不具备独立的法律人格,其权利、义务统一于合同行为之中,而非与消费者的对立之中。代言人不是经营者,法律不应当课以比经营者更重的严格责任,也不应让其承担连带责任。 The status and nature of spokesmen for advertising are different from operators,so their words and deeds do not have the trustworthiness.They do not have independent legal personality,and their rights and obligations have been unified in the action of contract,not being confrontational with consumers.As spokesmen are not operators,they should neither bear a heavier legal responsibility than operators do forced by laws nor be jointly and severally liable.
作者 金健
机构地区 南京大学
出处 《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》 2012年第1期85-87,共3页 Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词 广告代言人 虚假广告 严格责任 连带责任 spokesmen for advertising false advertising strict liability joint and several liability
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献36

共引文献50

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部